Probing triple-Higgs productions via 4b2γ decay channel at a 100 TeV hadron collider

Chien-Yi Chen, Qi-Shu Yan, Xiaoran Zhao, Zhijie Zhao, and Yi-Ming Zhong
Phys. Rev. D 93, 013007 – Published 11 January 2016

Abstract

The quartic self-coupling of the Standard Model Higgs boson can only be measured by observing the triple-Higgs production process, but it is challenging for the LHC Run 2 or International Linear Collider (ILC) at a few TeV because of its extremely small production rate. In this paper, we present a detailed Monte Carlo simulation study of the triple-Higgs production through gluon fusion at a 100 TeV hadron collider and explore the feasibility of observing this production mode. We focus on the decay channel HHHbb¯bb¯γγ, investigating detector effects and optimizing the kinematic cuts to discriminate the signal from the backgrounds. Our study shows that, in order to observe the Standard Model triple-Higgs signal, the integrated luminosity of a 100 TeV hadron collider should be greater than 1.8×104ab1. We also explore the dependence of the cross section upon the trilinear (λ3) and quartic (λ4) self-couplings of the Higgs. We find that, through a search in the triple-Higgs production, the parameters λ3 and λ4 can be restricted to the ranges [1,5] and [20,30], respectively. We also examine how new physics can change the production rate of triple-Higgs events. For example, in the singlet extension of the Standard Model, we find that the triple-Higgs production rate can be increased by a factor of O(10).

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 26 October 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.013007

© 2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Chien-Yi Chen1,2,3, Qi-Shu Yan4,5,6, Xiaoran Zhao4, Zhijie Zhao4,7,*, and Yi-Ming Zhong8

  • 1Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada
  • 3Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 2W9, Canada
  • 4School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
  • 5Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
  • 6Center for future high energy physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
  • 7Department of Physics, University of Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany
  • 8C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

  • *zhaozhijie12@mails.ucas.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×