Nuclear temperature and its dependence on the source neutron-proton asymmetry deduced using the Albergo thermometer

Y. Huang (黄宇), H. Zheng (郑华), R. Wada, X. Liu (刘星泉), W. Lin (林炜平), G. Qu (曲国峰), M. Huang (黄美容), P. Ren (任培培), J. Han (韩纪锋), A. Bonasera, K. Hagel, M. R. D. Rodrigues, S. Kowalski, T. Keutgen, M. Barbui, and J. B. Natowitz
Phys. Rev. C 103, 014601 – Published 5 January 2021

Abstract

Albergo thermometers with double isotope, isotone, and isobar yield ratio pairs with one proton and/or neutron difference are investigated. Without any extra sequential decay correction, a real temperature value of 4.9±0.5 MeV is deduced from the yields of the experimentally reconstructed primary hot intermediate mass fragments (IMFs) from Zn64+Sn112 collisions at 40 MeV/nucleon using the Albergo thermometer for the first time. An experimental sequential decay correction from the apparent temperatures to the real ones for 12 other reaction systems with different neutron-proton (N/Z) asymmetries in the same experiment, Zn70, Ni64 on Sn112,124, Ni58,64, Au197, and Th232 at 40 MeV/nucleon, is performed using an empirical correction factor approach of Tsang et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3836 (1997)] with the deduced 4.9-MeV temperature value. The dependence of nuclear temperature on the source N/Z asymmetry is further investigated using these deduced real source temperature values from the present 13 systems. It is found that the deduced real source temperatures at the present source N/Z range show a rather weak dependence on the source N/Z asymmetry. By comparison between our previous results and those from other independent experiments, a consistent description for the N/Z asymmetry dependence of nuclear temperature is addressed.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 September 2020
  • Revised 25 October 2020
  • Accepted 18 December 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014601

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Y. Huang (黄宇)1, H. Zheng (郑华)2, R. Wada3,4, X. Liu (刘星泉)1,*, W. Lin (林炜平)1,†, G. Qu (曲国峰)1, M. Huang (黄美容)5, P. Ren (任培培)1, J. Han (韩纪锋)1, A. Bonasera3,6, K. Hagel3, M. R. D. Rodrigues7, S. Kowalski8, T. Keutgen9, M. Barbui3, and J. B. Natowitz3

  • 1Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
  • 2School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
  • 3Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 4School of Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China
  • 5College of Physics and Electronics Information, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028000, China
  • 6Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN,via Santa Sofia, 62, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • 7Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 66318, CEP 05389-970, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 8Institute of Physics, Silesia University, Katowice, Poland
  • 9FNRS and IPN, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-Neuve, Belgium

  • *liuxingquan@scu.edu.cn
  • linwp1204@scu.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 1 — January 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×