Electronic structure of chromium trihalides beyond density functional theory

Swagata Acharya, Dimitar Pashov, Brian Cunningham, Alexander N. Rudenko, Malte Rösner, Myrta Grüning, Mark van Schilfgaarde, and Mikhail I. Katsnelson
Phys. Rev. B 104, 155109 – Published 5 October 2021

Abstract

We explore the electronic band structure of freestanding monolayers of chromium trihalides CrX3, X = Cl, Br, I, within an advanced ab initio theoretical approach based on the use of Green's function functionals. We compare the local density approximation with the quasiparticle self-consistent GW (QSGW) approximation and its self-consistent extension (QSGŴ) by solving the particle-hole ladder Bethe-Salpeter equations to improve the effective interaction W. We show that, at all levels of theory, the valence band consistently changes shape in the sequence ClBrI, and the valence band maximum shifts from the M point to the Γ point. By analyzing the dynamic and momentum-dependent self-energy, we show that QSGŴ adds to the localization of the systems in comparison with QSGW, thereby leading to a narrower band and reduced amount of halogens in the valence band manifold. Further analysis shows that X = Cl is most strongly correlated, and X = I is least correlated (most bandlike) as the hybridization between Cr d and X p enhances in the direction ClBrI. For CrBr3 and CrI3, we observe remarkable differences between the QSGW and QSGŴ valence band structures, while their eigenfunctions are very similar. We show that weak perturbations, like moderate strain, weak changes to the dp hybridization, and adding small U, can flip the valence band structures between these two solutions in these materials.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 16 June 2021
  • Revised 28 August 2021
  • Accepted 22 September 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.155109

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Swagata Acharya1,*, Dimitar Pashov2, Brian Cunningham3, Alexander N. Rudenko1, Malte Rösner1, Myrta Grüning4, Mark van Schilfgaarde2,5, and Mikhail I. Katsnelson1

  • 1Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, NL-6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 2King's College London, Theory and Simulation of Condensed Matter, The Strand, WC2R 2LS London, United Kingdom
  • 3Centre for Theoretical Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT71NN, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • 4Atomistic Simulation Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT71NN, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
  • 5National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

  • *swagata.acharya@ru.nl

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 15 — 15 October 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×