Resource theory of quantum uncomplexity

Nicole Yunger Halpern, Naga B. T. Kothakonda, Jonas Haferkamp, Anthony Munson, Jens Eisert, and Philippe Faist
Phys. Rev. A 106, 062417 – Published 15 December 2022

Abstract

Quantum complexity is emerging as a key property of many-body systems, including black holes, topological materials, and early quantum computers. A state's complexity quantifies the number of computational gates required to prepare the state from a simple tensor product. The greater a state's distance from maximal complexity, or “uncomplexity,” the more useful the state is as input to a quantum computation. Separately, resource theories—simple models for agents subject to constraints—are burgeoning in quantum information theory. We unite the two domains, confirming Brown and Susskind's conjecture that a resource theory of uncomplexity can be defined. The allowed operations, fuzzy operations, are slightly random implementations of two-qubit gates chosen by an agent. We formalize two operational tasks, uncomplexity extraction and expenditure. Their optimal efficiencies depend on an entropy that we engineer to reflect complexity. We also present two monotones, uncomplexity measures that decline monotonically under fuzzy operations, in certain regimes. This work unleashes on many-body complexity the resource-theory toolkit from quantum information theory.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 4 November 2021
  • Revised 30 August 2022
  • Accepted 17 November 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.062417

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

General PhysicsInterdisciplinary PhysicsQuantum Information, Science & TechnologyStatistical Physics & Thermodynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Nicole Yunger Halpern1,2,3,4,*, Naga B. T. Kothakonda5,6, Jonas Haferkamp5,7, Anthony Munson1, Jens Eisert5,7, and Philippe Faist5

  • 1Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST and University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 3ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 5Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
  • 6Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
  • 7Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, 14109 Berlin, Germany

  • *nicoleyh@umd.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 6 — December 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×