Explaining LIGO’s observations via isolated binary evolution with natal kicks

Daniel Wysocki, Davide Gerosa, Richard O’Shaughnessy, Krzysztof Belczynski, Wojciech Gladysz, Emanuele Berti, Michael Kesden, and Daniel E. Holz
Phys. Rev. D 97, 043014 – Published 23 February 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We compare binary evolution models with different assumptions about black-hole natal kicks to the first gravitational-wave observations performed by the LIGO detectors. Our comparisons attempt to reconcile merger rate, masses, spins, and spin-orbit misalignments of all current observations with state-of-the-art formation scenarios of binary black holes formed in isolation. We estimate that black holes (BHs) should receive natal kicks at birth of the order of σ200(50)km/s if tidal processes do (not) realign stellar spins. Our estimate is driven by two simple factors. The natal kick dispersion σ is bounded from above because large kicks disrupt too many binaries (reducing the merger rate below the observed value). Conversely, the natal kick distribution is bounded from below because modest kicks are needed to produce a range of spin-orbit misalignments. A distribution of misalignments increases our models’ compatibility with LIGO’s observations, if all BHs are likely to have natal spins. Unlike related work which adopts a concrete BH natal spin prescription, we explore a range of possible BH natal spin distributions. Within the context of our models, for all of the choices of σ used here and within the context of one simple fiducial parameterized spin distribution, observations favor low BH natal spin.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 8 September 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043014

© 2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Daniel Wysocki1,*, Davide Gerosa2, Richard O’Shaughnessy1, Krzysztof Belczynski3, Wojciech Gladysz4, Emanuele Berti5,6, Michael Kesden7, and Daniel E. Holz8,9

  • 1Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
  • 2TAPIR 350-17, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 3Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Ulica Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland
  • 4Astronomical Observatory, Warsaw University, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, USA
  • 6CENTRA, Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, 1049 Lisboa, Portugal
  • 7Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA
  • 8Enrico Fermi Institute, Department of Physics, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 9Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology and Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

  • *dw2081@rit.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 4 — 15 February 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×