• Editors' Suggestion

Equivalence Principle and Gravitational Redshift

Michael A. Hohensee, Steven Chu, Achim Peters, and Holger Müller
Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 151102 – Published 11 April 2011

Abstract

We investigate leading order deviations from general relativity that violate the Einstein equivalence principle in the gravitational standard model extension. We show that redshift experiments based on matter waves and clock comparisons are equivalent to one another. Consideration of torsion balance tests, along with matter-wave, microwave, optical, and Mössbauer clock tests, yields comprehensive limits on spin-independent Einstein equivalence principle-violating standard model extension terms at the 106 level.

  • Figure
  • Received 17 February 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.151102

© 2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Michael A. Hohensee1,*, Steven Chu1,†, Achim Peters2, and Holger Müller1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Newtonstrasse 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany

  • *hohensee@berkeley.edu
  • Present address: U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, USA.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 15 — 15 April 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×