Ion Clock Busts into New Precision Regime

Pierre Dubé

Viewpoint

Ion Clock Busts into New Precision Regime

Pierre Dubé

National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario

July 15, 2019• Physics 12, 79

An aluminum ion clock has a fractional-frequency uncertainty of less than one part in

1 0^{18}

, a four-decades-long goal in precision.

Figure caption — **Figure 1:** The ${Al}^{+}$ ion clock developed by the NIST group is the most precise clock available today. The ${Al}^{+}$ ion has many advantages over other ions. But in order to cool and detect it, the ion has to be coupled to a “partner ion,” which in the new clock is ${Mg}^{+}$ .

Which periodic oscillator would make the best clock? Nobody really knows. But in 1982 Hans Dehmelt—who would later win the Nobel prize for his development of the ion trap—realized that the “ultimate” time keeper might be a single ion, trapped by electric fields and cooled with lasers [1]. The frequency of light emitted by the ion as it transitions between two internal states could, Dehmelt estimated, be measured with a fractional uncertainty of $1 0^{- 18}$ , allowing a similarly precise definition of the second as a fixed number of cycles of the light wave. Nearly four decades later, researchers have fulfilled Dehmelt’s visionary prediction. Samuel Brewer and colleagues from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Colorado report an ${Al}^{+}$ ion clock with a fractional uncertainty of $0.94 \times 1 0^{- 18}$ , the most precise clock in existence today [2]. Using different ions or neutral atoms in so-called optical lattices, other groups are expected to soon reach the $1 0^{- 18}$ milestone [3–7], which would allow for increasingly precise tests of variations in fundamental constants.

Ions, like other atomic systems, have the great advantage that their natural transition frequencies are determined solely by physical constants and quantum mechanics. Provided that the ions are in a controlled environment, this frequency can be reproduced anywhere on Earth or even in space. Dehmelt’s bold prediction stemmed from his realization that an ion’s environment could, in principle, be controlled to near perfection. The combination of laser cooling and ion trapping would allow the ion to be held in a near motionless state, avoiding even the tiniest relativistic shifts to the ion frequency.

In his 1982 paper, Dehmelt identified $^{27} {Al}^{+}$ specifically as an excellent candidate for a high-precision clock [1]. This ion has a transition of around $1.21 \times 1 0^{15} Hz$ with an extremely small natural linewidth of $8 mHz$ [8]. And compared with other optical clock systems, the ${Al}^{+}$ transition is much less sensitive to blackbody radiation or to external magnetic- and electric-field gradients [6]. But the ion has two serious drawbacks. Its most accessible atomic transition for laser cooling is in the vacuum ultraviolet and therefore impractical for today’s laser technology. For similar reasons, the quantum state of the ion is difficult to detect using a conventional light-scattering measurement. In 2005, the NIST group showed they could circumvent these problems by trapping the ${Al}^{+}$ next to another ion (Fig. 1) that can be more easily laser cooled and detected [9]. As the partner ion is cooled, it pulls heat from the ${Al}^{+}$ ion through the Coulomb interaction. The same interaction can be harnessed to “imprint” the ${Al}^{+}$ electronic state on the motional states of its partner, which can be measured to characterize the ${Al}^{+}$ ion. Applying this partnering technique, known as quantum logic spectroscopy, the NIST researchers were able, in 2007, to measure the ${Al}^{+}$ clock transition with $5 \times 1 0^{- 15}$ uncertainty [8].

With the cooling technique in place, the NIST group has spent the last decade contending with the main perturbation to the ${Al}^{+}$ clock frequency: residual motion of the ion in the trap. This motion comes primarily from two sources—the trap and thermal effects (Fig. 2)—both of which affect ${Al}^{+}$ more than they do other clock ions because of its small mass. The first source, known as micromotion, arises from the trap itself, which is made of multiple electrodes whose voltages oscillate at radio frequencies (rf) and produce a “quadrupole” electric-field configuration (Fig. 2, left). Ideally, the ion sits where this rf field is zero. But imperfections in the trap can displace the ion into a region of finite rf field, which perturbs the ion’s energy levels (through the ac Stark effect). The field also accelerates the ion, resulting in time dilation of the clock frequency. In their new work, Brewer et al. reduced the uncertainty resulting from these two effects by operating the trap at a lower rf and voltage and by making real-time corrections to the remaining micromotion.

The second source, called secular motion (Fig. 2, right), comes from the thermal motion of the trapped ion and its partner ( $^{25} {Mg}^{+}$ in the new experiments.) The ion pair has 6 motional degrees of freedom, each of which contributes to a time-dilation shift. Electric field noise and other sources heat the ions, but a new trap design helped the researchers to minimize the heating rate while they were measuring the ion frequency. Building on earlier work [10], they also used a laser-cooling scheme that brought the ion pair to near its 3D motional ground state.

Addressing the motional perturbations was a big part of crossing the long-sought $1 0^{- 18}$ uncertainty threshold. But another crucial step was reducing the uncertainty that exists because an external magnetic field is needed to define the quantization axis of the quantum logic clock. This field shifts the clock transition by an amount that varies as the square of the field strength multiplied by a “sensitivity” coefficient, imposing a fractional shift of approximately $1 0^{- 15}$ . Brewer and colleagues halved the uncertainty from this “quadratic Zeeman shift” by accurately measuring the field strength (in situ, via the ${Al}^{+}$ ion) and by developing an improved method of measuring the sensitivity coefficient [11]. With the lowering of the uncertainties from micromotion ( $5.9 \times 1 0^{- 19}$ ), secular motion ( $2.9 \times 1 0^{- 19}$ ), the quadratic Zeeman shift ( $3.7 \times 1 0^{- 19}$ ), and other sources, the team reports a combined uncertainty of $9.4 \times 1 0^{- 19}$ .

Researchers have made impressive progress with optical clocks in the last 20 years, reducing the uncertainties by 4 orders of magnitude. This success came from countless improvements in experimental methods, including breakthroughs in laser stabilization, laser manipulation of atomic states, laser cooling, and, in particular, frequency measurement. On its own, an ion emitting at a precise frequency isn’t enough to make a clock—the oscillations of light have to be counted, a step that was enabled by the development of femtosecond frequency combs.

Already, today’s best optical clocks are sufficiently precise to benefit their intended applications—such as redefining the SI second, mapping Earth’s gravitational potential, testing fundamental physics, and navigation. Still, it’s only natural that $1 0^{- 19}$ will become the new goal, both for the intrinsic challenge and to continue the long tradition of precision measurements that have led to discoveries about the Universe.

This research is published in Physical Review Letters and Physical Review A.

References

H. G. Dehmelt, “Mono-ion oscillator as potential ultimate laser frequency standard,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. IM-31, 83 (1982).
S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, and D. R. Leibrandt, “ $^{27} {Al}^{+}$ quantum-logic clock with a systematic uncertainty below $1 0^{- 18}$ ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033201 (2019).
N. Huntemann, C. Sanner, B. Lipphardt, C. Tamm, and E. Peik, “Single-ion atomic clock with $3 \times 1 0^{18}$ systematic uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 063001 (2016).
W. F. McGrew et al., “Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level,” Nature 564, 87 (2018).
T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, E. Oelker, J. M. Robinson, S. L. Bromley, W. L. Tew, J. Ye, and C. J. Kennedy, “JILA SrI optical lattice clock with uncertainty of $2.0 \times 1 0^{- 18}$ ,” arXiv:1906.06004.
A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, “Optical atomic clocks,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015).
M. Abdel-Hafiz et al., “Guidelines for developing optical clocks with $1 0^{- 18}$ fractional frequency uncertainty,” arXiv:1906.11495.
T. Rosenband et al., “Observation of the $^{1} S_{0} \to^{3} P_{0}$ clock transition in $^{27} {Al}^{+}$ ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220801 (2007).
P. O. Schmidt, T. Rosenband, C. Langer, W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland, “Spectroscopy using quantum logic,” Science 309, 749 (2005).
J.-S. Chen, S. M. Brewer, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. B. Hume, “Sympathetic ground state cooling and time-dilation shifts in an $^{27} {Al}^{+}$ optical clock,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 053002 (2017).
S. M. Brewer et al., “Measurements of $^{27} {Al}^{+}$ and $^{25} {Mg}^{+}$ magnetic constants for improved ion-clock accuracy,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 013409 (2019).

About the Author

Pierre Dubé received his Ph.D. in physics from the University of Toronto in 1994. He went on to be a postdoctoral fellow at JILA in Boulder, Colorado, with John Hall, and a postdoctoral fellow at TRIUMF, in Vancouver, Canada, with Otto Haüsser. Since 2000, he has been working at the National Research Council of Canada. His main research interests include the development of ultrastable laser systems, the study of systematic frequency shifts in single-ion systems, and the development of high-accuracy single-ion optical clocks.

${}^{27}{Al}^{+}$ Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below $10^{- 18}$

S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, D. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, and D. R. Leibrandt

Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033201 (2019)

Published July 15, 2019

Read PDF

Measurements of ${}^{27}{Al}^{+}$ and ${}^{25}{Mg}^{+}$ magnetic constants for improved ion-clock accuracy

S. M. Brewer, J.-S. Chen, K. Beloy, A. M. Hankin, E. R. Clements, C. W. Chou, W. F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R. J. Fasano, D. Nicolodi, H. Leopardi, T. M. Fortier, S. A. Diddams, A. D. Ludlow, D. J. Wineland, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. B. Hume

Phys. Rev. A 100, 013409 (2019)

Published July 15, 2019

Read PDF