Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?

A. J. Leggett and Anupam Garg
Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 857 – Published 4 March 1985
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

It is shown that, in the context of an idealized ‘‘macroscopic quantum coherence’’ experiment, the predictions of quantum mechanics are incompatible with the conjunction of two general assumptions which are designated ‘‘macroscopic realism’’ and ‘‘noninvasive measurability at the macroscopic level.’’ The conditions under which quantum mechanics can be tested against these assumptions in a realistic experiment are discussed.

  • Received 9 November 1984

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857

©1985 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. J. Leggett

  • Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801 and Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Anupam Garg

  • Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Comments & Replies

Quantum Measurement Problem and Quantum Fluids

Robert H. Kraichnan
Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2723 (1985)

Leggett and Garg Respond

A. J. Leggett and Anupam Garg
Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2724 (1985)

Comment on ‘‘Realism and quantum flux tunneling’’

A. J. Leggett and Anupam Garg
Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1621 (1987)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 54, Iss. 9 — 4 March 1985

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×