Dynamical Phase Transitions in Sampling Complexity

Abhinav Deshpande, Bill Fefferman, Minh C. Tran, Michael Foss-Feig, and Alexey V. Gorshkov
Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 030501 – Published 19 July 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We make the case for studying the complexity of approximately simulating (sampling) quantum systems for reasons beyond that of quantum computational supremacy, such as diagnosing phase transitions. We consider the sampling complexity as a function of time t due to evolution generated by spatially local quadratic bosonic Hamiltonians. We obtain an upper bound on the scaling of t with the number of bosons n for which approximate sampling is classically efficient. We also obtain a lower bound on the scaling of t with n for which any instance of the boson sampling problem reduces to this problem and hence implies that the problem is hard, assuming the conjectures of Aaronson and Arkhipov [Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2011), p. 333]. This establishes a dynamical phase transition in sampling complexity. Further, we show that systems in the Anderson-localized phase are always easy to sample from at arbitrarily long times. We view these results in light of classifying phases of physical systems based on parameters in the Hamiltonian. In doing so, we combine ideas from mathematical physics and computational complexity to gain insight into the behavior of condensed matter, atomic, molecular, and optical systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 18 March 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.030501

© 2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & TechnologyCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Abhinav Deshpande1,2, Bill Fefferman1,3, Minh C. Tran1,2, Michael Foss-Feig4,1,2, and Alexey V. Gorshkov1,2

  • 1Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, NIST/University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Joint Quantum Institute, NIST/University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 3Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 4United States Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland 20783, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 121, Iss. 3 — 20 July 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×