Globally coupled stochastic two-state oscillators: Fluctuations due to finite numbers

Italo'Ivo Lima Dias Pinto, Daniel Escaff, Upendra Harbola, Alexandre Rosas, and Katja Lindenberg
Phys. Rev. E 89, 052143 – Published 29 May 2014

Abstract

Infinite arrays of coupled two-state stochastic oscillators exhibit well-defined steady states. We study the fluctuations that occur when the number N of oscillators in the array is finite. We choose a particular form of global coupling that in the infinite array leads to a pitchfork bifurcation from a monostable to a bistable steady state, the latter with two equally probable stationary states. The control parameter for this bifurcation is the coupling strength. In finite arrays these states become metastable: The fluctuations lead to distributions around the most probable states, with one maximum in the monostable regime and two maxima in the bistable regime. In the latter regime, the fluctuations lead to transitions between the two peak regions of the distribution. Also, we find that the fluctuations break the symmetry in the bimodal regime, that is, one metastable state becomes more probable than the other, increasingly so with increasing array size. To arrive at these results, we start from microscopic dynamical evolution equations from which we derive a Langevin equation that exhibits an interesting multiplicative noise structure. We also present a master equation description of the dynamics. Both of these equations lead to the same Fokker-Planck equation, the master equation via a 1/N expansion and the Langevin equation via standard methods of Itô calculus for multiplicative noise. From the Fokker-Planck equation we obtain an effective potential that reflects the transition from the monomodal to the bimodal distribution as a function of a control parameter. We present a variety of numerical and analytic results that illustrate the strong effects of the fluctuations. We also show that the limits N and t (t is the time) do not commute. In fact, the two orders of implementation lead to drastically different results.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 28 February 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052143

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Italo'Ivo Lima Dias Pinto1, Daniel Escaff2, Upendra Harbola3, Alexandre Rosas1, and Katja Lindenberg4

  • 1Departamento de Física, CCEN, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58059-900 João Pessoa, Brazil
  • 2Complex Systems Group, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Avenida Monseñor Álvaro del Portillo 12.455, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
  • 3Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India
  • 4Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and BioCircuits Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0340, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 5 — May 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×