RNA folding and combinatory landscapes

Walter Fontana, Peter F. Stadler, Erich G. Bornberg-Bauer, Thomas Griesmacher, Ivo L. Hofacker, Manfred Tacker, Pedro Tarazona, Edward D. Weinberger, and Peter Schuster
Phys. Rev. E 47, 2083 – Published 1 March 1993
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

In this paper we view the folding of polynucleotide (RNA) sequences as a map that assigns to each sequence a minimum-free-energy pattern of base pairings, known as secondary structure. Considering only the free energy leads to an energy landscape over the sequence space. Taking into account structure generates a less visualizable nonscalar ‘‘landscape,’’ where a sequence space is mapped into a space of discrete ‘‘shapes.’’ We investigate the statistical features of both types of landscapes by computing autocorrelation functions, as well as distributions of energy and structure distances, as a function of distance in sequence space. RNA folding is characterized by very short structure correlation lengths compared to the diameter of the sequence space. The correlation lengths depend strongly on the size and the pairing rules of the underlying nucleotide alphabet. Our data suggest that almost every minimum-free-energy structure is found within a small neighborhood of any random sequence. The interest in such landscapes results from the fact that they govern natural and artificial processes of optimization by mutation and selection. Simple statistical model landscapes, like Kauffman and Levin’s n-k model [J. Theor. Biol. 128, 11 (1987)], are often used as a proxy for understanding realistic landscapes, like those induced by RNA folding. We make a detailed comparison between the energy landscapes derived from RNA folding and those obtained from the n-k model. We derive autocorrelation functions for several variants of the n-k model, and briefly summarize work on its fine structure. The comparison leads to an estimate for k=7–8, independent of n, where n is the chain length. While the scaling behaviors agree, the fine structure is considerably different in the two cases. The reason is seen to be the extremely high frequency of neutral neighbors, that is, neighbors with identical energy (or structure), in the RNA case.

  • Received 2 October 1992

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.47.2083

©1993 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Walter Fontana

  • Santa Fe Institute, 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
  • Theoretical Division T-13, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545

Peter F. Stadler

  • Institut für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Wien, Währingerstra(27e 17, A-1090 Wien, Austria
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Am Fassberg, D-3400 Göttingen, Germany
  • Santa Fe Institute, 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501

Erich G. Bornberg-Bauer, Thomas Griesmacher, Ivo L. Hofacker, and Manfred Tacker

  • Institut für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Wien, Währingerstra(27e 17, A-1090 Wien, Austria

Pedro Tarazona

  • Institut für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Wien, Währingerstra(27e 17, A-1090 Wien, Austria
  • Departamento de Fisica de la Materia Condensada C-XII, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain

Edward D. Weinberger

  • Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Am Fassberg, D-3400 Göttingen, Germany

Peter Schuster

  • Institut für Theoretische Chemie, Universität Wien, Währingerstra(27e 17, A-1090 Wien, Austria
  • Santa Fe Institute, 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
  • Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie, Beutenbergstra(27e 11, D0-6900 Jena, Germany

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 47, Iss. 3 — March 1993

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×