Roles of four feedback loops in mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening induced by Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species

Hong Qi, Guoping Xu, Xiao-Long Peng, Xiang Li, Jianwei Shuai, and Rui Xu
Phys. Rev. E 102, 062422 – Published 23 December 2020
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Transient or sustained permeability transition pore (PTP) opening is important in normal physiology or cell death, respectively. These are closely linked to Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species (ROS). The entry of Ca2+ into mitochondria regulates ROS production, and both Ca2+ and ROS trigger PTP opening. In addition to this feedforward loop, there exist four feedback loops in the Ca2+-ROS-PTP system. ROS promotes Ca2+ entering (F1) and induces further ROS generation (F2), forming two positive feedback loops. PTP opening results in the efflux of Ca2+ (F3) and ROS (F4) from the mitochondria, forming two negative feedback loops. Owing to these complexities, we construct a mathematical model to dissect the roles of these feedback loops in the dynamics of PTP opening. The qualitative agreement between simulation results and recent experimental observations supports our hypothesis that under physiological conditions the PTP opens in an oscillatory state, while under pathological conditions it opens in a high steady state. We clarify that the negative feedback loops are responsible for producing oscillations, wherein F3 plays a more prominent role than F4; whereas the positive feedback loops are beneficial for maintaining oscillation robustness, wherein F1 has a more dominant role than F2. Furthermore, we manifest that the proper increase in negative feedback strength or decrease in positive feedback strength not only facilitates the occurrence of oscillations and thus protects the system against a high steady state, but also assists in lowering the oscillation peak. This study may provide potential therapeutic strategies in treating neurodegenerative diseases due to PTP dysfunction.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 2 June 2020
  • Accepted 4 December 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062422

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nonlinear DynamicsPhysics of Living Systems

Authors & Affiliations

Hong Qi1,2,*, Guoping Xu1,2, Xiao-Long Peng1,2, Xiang Li3,4, Jianwei Shuai3,4,5, and Rui Xu1,2,†

  • 1Complex Systems Research Center, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • 2Shanxi Key Laboratory of Mathematical Techniques and Big Data Analysis on Disease Control and Prevention, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • 3Department of Physics, College of Physical Science and Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
  • 5National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China

  • *Corresponding author: hongqi@sxu.edu.cn
  • Corresponding author: xurui@sxu.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 6 — December 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×