Epoch of reionization window. II. Statistical methods for foreground wedge reduction

Adrian Liu, Aaron R. Parsons, and Cathryn M. Trott
Phys. Rev. D 90, 023019 – Published 23 July 2014

Abstract

For there to be a successful measurement of the 21 cm epoch of reionization (EoR) power spectrum, it is crucial that strong foreground contaminants be robustly suppressed. These foregrounds come from a variety of sources (such as Galactic synchrotron emission and extragalactic point sources), but almost all share the property of being spectrally smooth and, when viewed through the chromatic response of an interferometer, occupy a signature “wedge” region in cylindrical kk Fourier space. The complement of the foreground wedge is termed the “EoR window” and is expected to be mostly foreground-free, allowing clean measurements of the power spectrum. This paper is a sequel to a previous paper that established a rigorous mathematical framework for describing the foreground wedge and the EoR window. Here, we use our framework to explore statistical methods by which the EoR window can be enlarged, thereby increasing the sensitivity of a power spectrum measurement. We adapt the Feldman-Kaiser-Peacock approximation (commonly used in galaxy surveys) for 21 cm cosmology and also compare the optimal quadratic estimator to simpler estimators that ignore covariances between different Fourier modes. The optimal quadratic estimator is found to suppress foregrounds by an extra factor of 105 in power at the peripheries of the EoR window, boosting the detection of the cosmological signal from 12σ to 50σ at the midpoint of reionization in our fiducial models. If numerical issues can be finessed, decorrelation techniques allow the EoR window to be further enlarged, enabling measurements to be made deep within the foreground wedge. These techniques do not assume that foreground is Gaussian distributed, and we additionally prove that a final round of foreground subtraction can be performed after decorrelation in a way that is guaranteed to have no cosmological signal loss.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 21 April 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023019

© 2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Adrian Liu*

  • Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA and Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Aaron R. Parsons

  • Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA and Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Cathryn M. Trott

  • International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia 6009, Australia and ARC Centre of Excellence for All-Sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia 6009, Australia

  • *acliu@berkeley.edu

See Also

Epoch of reionization window. I. Mathematical formalism

Adrian Liu, Aaron R. Parsons, and Cathryn M. Trott
Phys. Rev. D 90, 023018 (2014)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 90, Iss. 2 — 15 July 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×