Abstract
Background: Odd-odd nuclei, around doubly closed shells, have been extensively used to study proton-neutron interactions. However, the evolution of these interactions as a function of the binding energy, ultimately when nuclei become unbound, is poorly known. The nucleus, composed of a deeply bound proton and an unbound neutron on top of an core, is particularly adapted for this purpose. The coupling of this proton and neutron results in a multiplet, whose energies must be determined to study the influence of the proximity of the continuum on the corresponding proton-neutron interaction. The bound states have been determined, and only a clear identification of the is missing.
Purpose: We wish to complete the study of the multiplet in , by studying the energy and width of the unbound state. The method was first validated by the study of unbound states in , for which resonances were already observed in a previous experiment.
Method: Radioactive beams of and , produced at about by the fragment separator at the GSI facility were used to populate unbound states in and via one-proton knockout reactions on a target, located at the object focal point of the /LAND setup. The detection of emitted rays and neutrons, added to the reconstruction of the momentum vector of the nuclei, allowed the determination of the energy of three unbound states in and two in .
Results: Based on its width and decay properties, the first unbound state in , at the relative energy of 49(9) keV, is proposed to be a arising from a proton-hole state. In , the first resonance at 323(33) keV is proposed to be the member of the multiplet. Energies of observed states in have been compared to calculations using the independent-particle shell model, a phenomenological shell model, and the ab initio valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group method.
Conclusions: The deduced effective proton-neutron interaction is weakened by about 30–40% in comparison to the models, pointing to the need for implementing the role of the continuum in theoretical descriptions or to a wrong determination of the atomic mass of .
- Received 14 November 2016
- Revised 26 April 2017
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054305
©2017 American Physical Society