Determination of the Ce142(γ,n) cross section using quasi-monoenergetic Compton backscattered γ rays

A. Sauerwein, K. Sonnabend, M. Fritzsche, J. Glorius, E. Kwan, N. Pietralla, C. Romig, G. Rusev, D. Savran, L. Schnorrenberger, A. P. Tonchev, W. Tornow, and H. R. Weller
Phys. Rev. C 89, 035803 – Published 7 March 2014

Abstract

Background: Knowing the energy dependence of the (γ,n) cross section is mandatory to predict the abundances of heavy elements using astrophysical models. The data can be applied directly or used to constrain the cross section of the inverse (n,γ) reaction.

Purpose: The measurement of the reaction Ce142(γ,n)141Ce just above the reaction threshold amends the existing experimental database in that mass region for p-process nucleosynthesis and helps to understand the s-process branching at the isotope Ce141.

Method: The quasi-monoenergetic photon beam of the High Intensity γ-ray Source (HIγS), TUNL, USA, is used to irradiate naturally composed Ce targets. The reaction yield is determined afterwards with high-resolution γ-ray spectroscopy.

Results: The experimental data are in agreement with previous measurements at higher energies. Since the cross-section prediction of the Ce142(γ,n) reaction is exclusively sensitive to the γ-ray strength function, the resulting cross-section values were compared to Hauser-Feshbach calculations using different γ-ray strength functions. A microscopic description within the framework of the Hartree-Fock-BCS model describes the experimental values well within the measured energy range.

Conclusions: The measured data show that the predicted (γ,n) reaction rate is correct within a factor of 2 even though the closed neutron shell N=82 is approached. This agreement allows us to constrain the (n,γ) cross section and to improve the understanding of the s-process branching at Ce141.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 2 January 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.035803

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. Sauerwein1,*, K. Sonnabend1, M. Fritzsche2, J. Glorius1, E. Kwan3,4,†, N. Pietralla2, C. Romig2, G. Rusev3,4,‡, D. Savran5,6, L. Schnorrenberger2, A. P. Tonchev3,4,§, W. Tornow3,4, and H. R. Weller3,4

  • 1Institut für Angewandte Physik, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 2Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 4Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL), Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 5ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI and Research Division, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, GmbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 6Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies FIAS, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  • *sauerwein@iap.uni-frankfurt.de
  • Present address: National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
  • Present address: Chemistry Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA.
  • §Present address: Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 3 — March 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×