Comparison of nonequilibrium processes in p+Ni and p+Au collisions at GeV energies

A. Budzanowski, M. Fidelus, D. Filges, F. Goldenbaum, H. Hodde, L. Jarczyk, B. Kamys, M. Kistryn, St. Kistryn, St. Kliczewski, A. Kowalczyk, E. Kozik, P. Kulessa, H. Machner, A. Magiera, B. Piskor-Ignatowicz, K. Pysz, Z. Rudy, R. Siudak, and M. Wojciechowski (PISA Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 82, 034605 – Published 15 September 2010

Abstract

The energy and angular dependence of double differential cross sections d2σ/dΩdE were measured for p,d,t, He3,4,6, Li6,7,8, Be7,9,10, B10,11, and C produced in collisions of 1.2, 1.9, and 2.5 GeV protons with a Ni target. The shape of the spectra and angular distributions almost does not change whereas the absolute value of the cross sections increases by a factor ~1.7 for all ejectiles in this beam energy range. It was found that energy and angular dependencies of the cross sections cannot be reproduced by microscopic models of intranuclear cascade including coalescence of nucleons coupled to statistical model for evaporation of particles from excited, equilibrated residual nuclei. The inclusion of nonequilibrium processes, described by a phenomenological model of the emission from fast and hot moving sources, resulting from break up of the target nucleus, leads to very good reproduction of data. Cross sections of these processes are quite large, exhausting approximately half of the total production cross sections. Due to good reproduction of energy and angular dependencies of d2σ/dΩdE it was possible to determine total production cross sections for all studied ejectiles. Results obtained in this work point to the analogous reaction mechanism for proton induced reactions on Ni target as that observed previously for Au target in the same beam energy range.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 1 September 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.034605

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. Budzanowski1, M. Fidelus2, D. Filges3, F. Goldenbaum3, H. Hodde4, L. Jarczyk2, B. Kamys2,*, M. Kistryn1, St. Kistryn2, St. Kliczewski1, A. Kowalczyk2, E. Kozik1, P. Kulessa1,3, H. Machner3, A. Magiera2, B. Piskor-Ignatowicz2,3, K. Pysz1,3, Z. Rudy2, R. Siudak1,3, and M. Wojciechowski2 (PISA Collaboration)

  • 1H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, PL-31342 Kraków, Poland
  • 2M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University, Reymonta 4, PL-30059 Kraków, Poland
  • 3Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 4Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Bonn University, D-53121 Bonn, Germany

  • *Corresponding author: ufkamys@cyf-kr.edu.pl

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 3 — September 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×