Search for fission from a long-lived isomer in No250 and evidence of a second isomer

J. Khuyagbaatar, H. Brand, Ch. E. Düllmann, F. P. Heßberger, E. Jäger, B. Kindler, J. Krier, N. Kurz, B. Lommel, Yu. Nechiporenko, Yu. N. Novikov, B. Schausten, and A. Yakushev
Phys. Rev. C 106, 024309 – Published 5 August 2022

Abstract

In the present work, a K isomeric state in No250, which is more stable against fission than the ground state, was experimentally studied. The aim was to measure the fission branch of this isomeric state. In total, 780 fission events attributed to the decay of No250 were detected. Among them 133 cases were attributed to the ground-state decay with a half-life of 4.0(4) μs, which was populated by the deexcitation of the isomeric state via electromagnetic transitions with a half-life of 23(4) μs. In addition, in two more cases, this long-lived isomeric state was populated in the deexcitation of a hitherto unknown, yet higher-lying and short-lived isomeric state with a half-life of 0.70.3+1.4μs. No direct fission from the long-lived isomeric state, i.e., with a lifetime of longer than 40 μs, was identified. This results in an upper limit of 0.035 for the branching ratio for fission. This is a significantly more strict limit than the previously known value of 0.5. Nonobservation of fission branching of the long-lived isomer is discussed relative to theoretical predictions and within various semiempirical ways, which resulted in an attribution of a lower limit of 104 for the fission-hindrance factor, caused by the K quantum number. The presences of multiple high-K isomeric states seemingly is a widespread phenomenon in deformed heavy nuclei.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 June 2022
  • Accepted 26 July 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024309

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

J. Khuyagbaatar1,2,*, H. Brand2, Ch. E. Düllmann1,2,3, F. P. Heßberger1,2, E. Jäger2, B. Kindler2, J. Krier2, N. Kurz2, B. Lommel2, Yu. Nechiporenko4,5, Yu. N. Novikov4,5, B. Schausten2, and A. Yakushev2

  • 1Helmholtz-Institut Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 2GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 3Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 4St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia
  • 5Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Gatchina, Leningrad Region, 188300, Russia

  • *J.Khuyagbaatar@gsi.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 2 — August 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×