Isoscalar monopole and dipole transitions in Mg24, Mg26, and Si28

P. Adsley, V. O. Nesterenko, M. Kimura, L. M. Donaldson, R. Neveling, J. W. Brümmer, D. G. Jenkins, N. Y. Kheswa, J. Kvasil, K. C. W. Li, D. J. Marín-Lámbarri, Z. Mabika, P. Papka, L. Pellegri, V. Pesudo, B. Rebeiro, P.-G. Reinhard, F. D. Smit, and W. Yahia-Cherif
Phys. Rev. C 103, 044315 – Published 19 April 2021

Abstract

Background: Nuclei in the sd shell demonstrate a remarkable interplay of cluster and mean-field phenomena. The N=Z nuclei, such as Mg24 and Si28, have been the focus of the theoretical study of both phenomena in the past. A variety of different cluster structures in these nuclei are predicted, characterized by isoscalar dipole and monopole transitions. For example, low-energy isoscalar vortical dipole states were predicted in Mg24. The cluster and vortical mean-field phenomena can be probed by excitation of isoscalar monopole and dipole states in scattering of isoscalar particles such as deuterons or α particles.

Purpose: We investigate, both experimentally and theoretically, the isoscalar dipole IS1 and monopole IS0 strengths in three essentially different light nuclei with different properties: stiff prolate Mg24, soft prolate Mg26, and soft oblate Si28. We analyze possible manifestations of clustering and vorticity in these nuclei.

Methods: Inelastically scattered α particles were momentum analyzed in the K600 magnetic spectrometer at iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa. The scattered particles were detected in two multiwire drift chambers and two plastic scintillators placed at the focal plane of the K600. In the theoretical discussion, the Skyrme quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) and antisymmetrized molecular dynamics + generator coordinate method (AMD+GCM) were used.

Results: A number of isoscalar monopole and dipole transitions were observed in the nuclei studied. Using this information, suggested structural assignments have been made for the various excited states. IS1 and IS0 strengths obtained within QRPA and AMD+GCM are compared with the experimental data. The QRPA calculations lead us to conclude that (i) the mean-field vorticity appears mainly in dipole states with K=1, (ii) the dipole (monopole) states should have strong deformation-induced octupole (quadrupole) admixtures, and (iii) near the α-particle threshold there should exist a collective state with K=0 for prolate nuclei and K=1 for oblate nuclei, with an impressive octupole strength. The results of the AMD+GCM calculations suggest that some observed states may have a mixed (mean-field + cluster) character or correspond to particular cluster configurations.

Conclusion: A tentative correspondence between observed states and theoretical states from QRPA and AMD+GCM was established. The QRPA and AMD+GCM analysis shows that low-energy isoscalar dipole states combine cluster and mean-field properties. The QRPA calculations show that the low-energy vorticity is well localized in Mg24, fragmented in Mg26, and absent in Si28.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 16 October 2020
  • Revised 11 February 2021
  • Accepted 17 March 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044315

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

P. Adsley1,2,3,4,*, V. O. Nesterenko5,6,7, M. Kimura8,9, L. M. Donaldson3,1, R. Neveling3, J. W. Brümmer2, D. G. Jenkins10, N. Y. Kheswa3, J. Kvasil11, K. C. W. Li2, D. J. Marín-Lámbarri3,12,13, Z. Mabika12, P. Papka2, L. Pellegri3,1, V. Pesudo3,12,14, B. Rebeiro12, P.-G. Reinhard15, F. D. Smit3, and W. Yahia-Cherif16

  • 1School of Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
  • 2Department of Physics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland, Stellenbosch, South Africa
  • 3iThemba Laboratory for Accelerator Based Sciences, Somerset West 7129, South Africa
  • 4Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay, UMR8608, IN2P3-CNRS, Université Paris Sud 11, 91406 Orsay, France
  • 5Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region 141980, Russia
  • 6State University “Dubna”, Dubna, Moscow Region 141980, Russia
  • 7Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region 141701, Russia
  • 8Department of Physics, Hokkaido University, 060-0810 Sapporo, Japan
  • 9Reaction Nuclear Data Centre, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, 060-0810 Sapporo, Japan
  • 10Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
  • 11Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Charles University, CZ-18000, Praha 8, Czech Republic
  • 12Department of Physics, University of the Western Cape, P/B X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
  • 13Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 20-364, 01000 Ciudad México, México
  • 14Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Madrid 28040, Spain
  • 15Institut für Theoretische Physik II, Universität Erlangen, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 16Université des Sciences et de la Technologie Houari Boumediene (USTHB), Faculté de Physique, B.P. 32 El-Alia, 16111 Bab Ezzouar, Algiers, Algeria

  • *philip.adsley@wits.ac.za

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 4 — April 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×