Direct determination of the La138β-decay Q value using Penning trap mass spectrometry

R. Sandler, G. Bollen, J. Dissanayake, M. Eibach, K. Gulyuz, A. Hamaker, C. Izzo, X. Mougeot, D. Puentes, F. G. A. Quarati, M. Redshaw, R. Ringle, and I. Yandow
Phys. Rev. C 100, 014308 – Published 11 July 2019

Abstract

Background: The understanding and description of forbidden decays provides interesting challenges for nuclear theory. These calculations could help to test underlying nuclear models and interpret experimental data.

Purpose: Compare a direct measurement of the La138β-decay Q value with the β-decay spectrum end-point energy measured by Quarati et al. using LaBr3 detectors [Appl. Radiat. Isot. 108, 30 (2016)]. Use new precise measurements of the La138β-decay and electron capture (EC) Q values to improve theoretical calculations of the β-decay spectrum and EC probabilities.

Method: High-precision Penning trap mass spectrometry was used to measure cyclotron frequency ratios of La138, Ce138, and Ba138 ions from which β-decay and EC Q values for La138 were obtained.

Results: The La138β-decay and EC Q values were measured to be Qβ=1052.42(41) keV and QEC=1748.41(34) keV, improving the precision compared to the values obtained in the most recent atomic mass evaluation [Wang et al., Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017)] by an order of magnitude. These results are used for improved calculations of the La138β-decay shape factor and EC probabilities. New determinations for the Ce138 2EC Q value and the atomic masses of La138, Ce138, and Ba138 are also reported.

Conclusion: The La138β-decay Q value measured by Quarati et al. is in excellent agreement with our new result, which is an order of magnitude more precise. Uncertainties in the shape factor calculations for La138β decay using our new Q value are reduced by an order of magnitude. Uncertainties in the EC probability ratios are also reduced and show improved agreement with experimental data.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 29 April 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014308

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

R. Sandler1,2,*, G. Bollen2,3,4, J. Dissanayake1, M. Eibach2,5, K. Gulyuz1, A. Hamaker2,4, C. Izzo2,4, X. Mougeot6, D. Puentes2,4, F. G. A. Quarati7,8, M. Redshaw2,1, R. Ringle2, and I. Yandow2,4

  • 1Department of Physics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859, USA
  • 2National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 3Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 5Institut für Physik, Universität Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
  • 6CEA, LIST, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), Bât. 602 PC111, CEA-Saclay 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
  • 7AS, RST, LM, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629JB Delft, The Netherlands
  • 8Gonitec BV, Johannes Bildersstraat 60, 259EJ Den Haag, The Netherlands

  • *sandler@nscl.msu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 100, Iss. 1 — July 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×