Insights into the evolution from ferromagnetism to antiferromagnetism: A doping-dependent study of NaCrSixGe2xO6(0x2)

W. Tian, J.-Q. Yan, and A. I. Kolesnikov
Phys. Rev. B 99, 064427 – Published 20 February 2019

Abstract

NaCrGe2O6 and NaCrSi2O6 are isostructural compounds exhibiting different magnetic ground states. NaCrGe2O6 adopts a ferromagnetic ground state with Tc=6K, whereas NaCrSi2O6 orders antiferromagnetically below TN=3.4K. Although it has been proposed that the intriguing magnetic behavior in Cr-based pyroxenes involves competition between antiferromagnetic direct exchange and ferromagnetic superexchange interactions, a delicate balance that is sensitive to Cr-Cr distance and local distortion, no spectroscopy study has been done to determine the microscopic interactions in these compounds. To delve deeper into the evolution from ferromagnetism to antiferromagnetism, we performed a doping-dependent study to investigate how the substitution of Ge by Si affects the magnetic properties of NaCrSixGe2xO6 (x=0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2). Neutron diffraction and magnetization measurements show that replacing larger Ge with smaller Si simultaneously suppresses the ferromagnetic order. The lattice constants and the unit-cell volume contract, i.e., chemical pressure effect, and the Cr-Cr distance within the chain gradually decreases with increasing Si doping. High-resolution inelastic neutron-scattering studies of the spin waves of NaCrGe2O6 and NaCrSi2O6 indicate that replacing Ge with Si has profound effect on the intrachain coupling, whereas it has negligible effect on the interchain couplings. We compare our results, which indicate NaCrGe2O6 is magnetic quasi-one-dimensional (1D) and NaCrSi2O6 is three-dimensional (3D), with LiCr(Si,Ge)2O6, where LiCrSi2O6 is proposed to be magnetic quasi-1D and LiCrGe2O6 is 3D, and discuss the different behaviors in magnetic dimensionality crossover in the context of how substituting Ge with Si fine-tunes the relative ratio between the intrachain and interchain couplings that defines the magnetic dimensionality in these materials.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 3 January 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064427

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

W. Tian1,*, J.-Q. Yan2, and A. I. Kolesnikov1

  • 1Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 2Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

  • *wt6@ornl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 6 — 1 February 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×