Difference in magnetic and ferroelectric properties between rhombohedral and hexagonal polytypes of AgFeO2: A single-crystal study

Noriki Terada, Yuta Ikedo, Hirohiko Sato, Dmitry D. Khalyavin, Pascal Manuel, Fabio Orlandi, Yoshihiro Tsujimoto, Yoshitaka Matsushita, Atsushi Miyake, Akira Matsuo, Masashi Tokunaga, and Koichi Kindo
Phys. Rev. B 99, 064402 – Published 1 February 2019
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We have investigated magnetic and dielectric properties of rhombohedral 3RAgFeO2 and hexagonal 2HAgFeO2 by using magnetic and dielectric bulk measurements and a neutron diffraction experiment with single crystals grown by hydrothermal synthesis. Magnetic phase transitions occur at T=14.0 K and T=6.0 K in 3RAgFeO2 and T=17.0 K and T=9.5 K in 2HAgFeO2 under zero magnetic field. Multistep metamagnetic phase transitions were observed in 3RAgFeO2 in magnetization measurements up to 60 T, while a single phase transition occurs in 2HAgFeO2. The ferroelectric polarization parallel and perpendicular to the triangular lattice plane appears below T=6.0K in 3RAgFeO2, which is concomitant with the onset of the cycloid magnetic ordering with the propagation vector k=(12,q,12;q0.2) and the magnetic point group polar m1. On the other hand, the ferroelectric polarization is absent even below the lower phase transition temperature in 2HAgFeO2, which can be explained by the proper screw magnetic structure with k=(0,q,0;q0.4) and the nonpolar 2221 point group. Although the two-dimensional triangular lattice layers of Fe3+ are common in the two polytypes, the magnetic and ferroelectric properties are significantly different. The emergence of ferroelectric polarization which is not confined to be within the plane of the cycloid for 3RAgFeO2 can be explained by the extended inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya effect with two orthogonal components, p1rij×[Si×Sj] and p2Si×Sj. Unlike other delafossite compounds, the p2 component is not allowed in the proper screw phase of 2HAgFeO2 due to the symmetry restriction of the parent space group.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 18 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064402

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Noriki Terada1,*, Yuta Ikedo2, Hirohiko Sato2,†, Dmitry D. Khalyavin3, Pascal Manuel3, Fabio Orlandi3, Yoshihiro Tsujimoto1, Yoshitaka Matsushita1, Atsushi Miyake4, Akira Matsuo4, Masashi Tokunaga4, and Koichi Kindo4

  • 1National Institute for Materials Science, Sengen 1-2-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
  • 2Department of Physics, Chuo University, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan
  • 3ISIS facility, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 4Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan

  • *terada.noriki@nims.go.jp
  • hirohiko@phys.chuo-u.ac.jp

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 6 — 1 February 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×