Thermal evolution of antiferromagnetic correlations and tetrahedral bond angles in superconducting FeTe1xSex

Zhijun Xu, J. A. Schneeloch, Jinsheng Wen, E. S. Božin, G. E. Granroth, B. L. Winn, M. Feygenson, R. J. Birgeneau, Genda Gu, I. A. Zaliznyak, J. M. Tranquada, and Guangyong Xu
Phys. Rev. B 93, 104517 – Published 14 March 2016

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that dynamical magnetic correlations measured by neutron scattering in iron chalcogenides can be described with models of short-range correlations characterized by particular choices of four-spin plaquettes, where the appropriate choice changes as the parent material is doped towards superconductivity. Here we apply such models to describe measured maps of magnetic scattering as a function of two-dimensional wave vectors obtained for optimally superconducting crystals of FeTe1xSex. We show that the characteristic antiferromagnetic wave vector evolves from that of the bicollinear structure found in underdoped chalcogenides (at high temperature) to that associated with the stripe structure of antiferromagnetic iron arsenides (at low temperature); these can both be described with the same local plaquette, but with different interplaquette correlations. While the magnitude of the low-energy magnetic spectral weight is substantial at all temperatures, it actually weakens somewhat at low temperature, where the charge carriers become more itinerant. The observed change in spin correlations is correlated with the dramatic drop in the electronic scattering rate and the growth of the bulk nematic response upon cooling. Finally, we also present powder neutron diffraction results for lattice parameters in FeTe1xSex indicating that the tetrahedral bond angle tends to increase towards the ideal value upon cooling, in agreement with the increased screening of the crystal field by more itinerant electrons and the correspondingly smaller splitting of the Fe 3d orbitals.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 25 December 2015
  • Revised 24 February 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.104517

©2016 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Zhijun Xu1,2, J. A. Schneeloch3,4, Jinsheng Wen5, E. S. Božin3, G. E. Granroth6, B. L. Winn7, M. Feygenson8, R. J. Birgeneau1,2, Genda Gu3, I. A. Zaliznyak3, J. M. Tranquada3, and Guangyong Xu3,*

  • 1Physics Department, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA
  • 5Center for Superconducting Physics and Materials, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 6Neutron Data Analysis and Visualization Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 7Quantum Condensed Matter Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 8Chemical and Engineering Materials Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

  • *Corresponding author: gxu@bnl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×