Source of magnetic anisotropy in quasi-two-dimensional XY {Cu4(tetrenH5)W(CN)8]4·7.2H2O)}n bilayer molecular magnet

O. Zaharko, M. Pregelj, A. Zorko, R. Podgajny, A. Gukasov, J. van Tol, S. I. Klokishner, S. Ostrovsky, and B. Delley
Phys. Rev. B 87, 024406 – Published 9 January 2013

Abstract

To identify the origin of the XY spin dimensionality in the bilayered system {Cu4(tetrenH5)[W(CN)8]4·7.2H2O}n (WCuT) we use a combination of single-crystal experiments (bulk magnetization, neutron flipping ratio, electron magnetic resonance, neutron diffraction) and theoretical modeling (exchange-charge model of the crystal field, dipolar energy, and density functional calculations). Our experiments show that the magnetic properties of WCuT are anisotropic and two-dimensional correlations build up below 70 K. The hard anisotropy axis is perpendicular to the layers (b axis) and a small anisotropy within the ac layers is present. Modeling of the crystal field validates treatment of tungsten and copper as spin S=12 ions with anisotropic g values. The local magnetic anisotropy results from the common action of the crystal field and spin-orbit coupling and is along the c axis for both ions. Density functional calculations identify the origin of the ferromagnetic exchange in different energies and symmetries of the tungsten- and copper-dominated orbitals and anticipate different exchange couplings across the apical (along the b axis) and equatorial (in the ac plane) Cu-CN-W bridges due to difference in the hybridization efficiency. Calculation of the dipolar energy for various spin configurations suggests that dipolar interactions play a decisive role in the ac-planar anisotropy in this system. We propose that the effective XY spin dimensionality in WCuT is established by a combination of the axial local anisotropy of the W and Cu ions and the long-range magnetic dipolar interactions on the bilayered square lattice.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 28 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.024406

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

O. Zaharko1, M. Pregelj1,2, A. Zorko2,3, R. Podgajny4, A. Gukasov5, J. van Tol6, S. I. Klokishner7, S. Ostrovsky7, and B. Delley8

  • 1Laboratory for Neutron Scattering, Paul Scherrer Insitute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
  • 2Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 3EN-FIST Centre of Excellence, Dunajska 156, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 4Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków, Poland
  • 5Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-SNRS, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France
  • 6National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA
  • 7Institute of Applied Physics, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, MD-2028 Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
  • 8Condensed Matter Theory, Paul Scherrer Insitute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 2 — 1 January 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×