Structural phase transitions in the geometric ferroelectric LaTaO4

Grant W. Howieson, Karuna K. Mishra, Alexandra S. Gibbs, Ram S. Katiyar, James F. Scott, Finlay D. Morrison, and Michael Carpenter
Phys. Rev. B 103, 014119 – Published 29 January 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The recent report of an intermediate incommensurately modulated orthorhombic phase in LaTaO4 has prompted a re-examination of the phase transition sequence in LaTaO4 as a function of temperature. With falling temperature, the sequence of phases examined is (orthorhombic) Cmc21(C)Cmc21(IC)(monoclinic)P21/c, with C and IC denoting commensurate and incommensurate phases, respectively. The orthorhombic to monoclinic transition, Tmo, is a first order reconstructive transition occurring at 440 K and TICC is a first-order displacive transition occurring at 500–530 K. Strain and elasticity data confirm a first-order transition between the basic and modulated Cmc21 phases, with similarities to the isostructural fluoride BaMnF4. A Raman spectroscopic study of the LaTaO4 phase transition indicates that the IC-C phase transition is driven by a soft zone-boundary phonon (unstable) of the commensurate orthorhombic (Cmc21) phase. The soft phonon is found to appear (underdamped) above 443 K and vanishes (overdamped) around 528 K. A large supercell of the monoclinic phase below Tmo is proposed based on the Raman spectroscopic results.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 3 November 2020
  • Revised 23 December 2020
  • Accepted 6 January 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.014119

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Grant W. Howieson1, Karuna K. Mishra2, Alexandra S. Gibbs3, Ram S. Katiyar2, James F. Scott1,4, Finlay D. Morrison1,*, and Michael Carpenter5,*

  • 1EaStCHEM, School of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Physics and Institute for Functional Nanomaterials, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, 00931-3334, USA
  • 3ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Oxon, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 4SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding authors: finlay.morrison@st-andrews.ac.uk; mc43@esc.cam.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×