Reply to “Comment on ‘Scattering Cancellation-Based Cloaking for the Maxwell-Cattaneo Heat Waves’”

Figure 1

Landscape of scattering cross section on the logarithmic scale, i.e., $10\mathrm{lo}{\mathrm{g}}_{10}|{\mathrm{\Sigma }}_2^{sc}/{\mathrm{\Sigma }}_1^{sc}|$ for (a) $\sigma =0.1{\sigma }_0$ and (b) $\sigma =0$, with ${\sigma }_0$ being the value used in Ref. [2]. Dashed blue line corresponds to cloaking condition derived from our model in Ref. [2].

Figure 2

Contour plot of conductivities that make cloaking possible for (a) $\omega {\tau }_0=0.1$ and (b) $\omega {\tau }_0=0.4$. Dashed curves correspond to flux expression in Ref. [1], while solid lines correspond to flux expression used in Ref. [2].