Thickness dependence of magnetization reversal and magnetostriction in Fe81Ga19 thin films

W. Jahjah, R. Manach, Y. Le Grand, A. Fessant, B. Warot-Fonrose, A.R.E. Prinsloo, C.J. Sheppard, D.T. Dekadjevi, D. Spenato, and J.-Ph. Jay
Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 024020 – Published 12 August 2019

Abstract

Among the magnetostrictive alloys, the one formed of iron and gallium (called “Galfenol” from its U.S. Office of Naval Research discoverers in the late 1990s) is attractive for its low hysteresis, good tensile stress, good machinability, and its rare-earth-free composition. One of its applications is its association with a piezoelectric material to form an extrinsic multiferroic composite as an alternative to the rare room-temperature intrinsic multiferroics such as BiFeO3. This study focuses on thin Fe0.81Ga0.19 films of thickness 5, 10, 20, and 60 nm deposited by sputtering onto glass substrates under a deposition field Hdep300 Oe. Magnetization reversal study reveals a well-defined symmetry with two principal directions independent of the thickness. The magnetic signature of this magnetic anisotropy decreases with increasing Fe81Ga19 thickness due to an increase of the nonpreferential polycrystalline arrangement, as revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations. Thus, when magnetic field is applied along these specific nontrivial directions, magnetization reversal is mainly coherent for the thinnest sample, as seen from the transverse magnetization cycles. The magnetostriction coefficient reaches 20 ppm for the 5-nm film and decreases for thicker samples, where the polycrystalline part with nonpreferential orientation prevails.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 26 March 2019
  • Revised 14 June 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.024020

© 2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

W. Jahjah1, R. Manach1, Y. Le Grand1, A. Fessant1, B. Warot-Fonrose2, A.R.E. Prinsloo3, C.J. Sheppard3, D.T. Dekadjevi1,3, D. Spenato1, and J.-Ph. Jay1,*

  • 1Laboratoire d’Optique et de Magnétisme (OPTIMAG), EA 938, IBSAM, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest 29200, France
  • 2Nanomaterials Group - CEMES CNRS-UPR 8011, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse 31055, France
  • 3Department of Physics, Cr Research Group, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa

  • *jay@univ-brest.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 12, Iss. 2 — August 2019

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×