Securing quantum key distribution systems using fewer states

Nurul T. Islam, Charles Ci Wen Lim, Clinton Cahall, Jungsang Kim, and Daniel J. Gauthier
Phys. Rev. A 97, 042347 – Published 30 April 2018

Abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) allows two remote users to establish a secret key in the presence of an eavesdropper. The users share quantum states prepared in two mutually unbiased bases: one to generate the key while the other monitors the presence of the eavesdropper. Here, we show that a general d-dimension QKD system can be secured by transmitting only a subset of the monitoring states. In particular, we find that there is no loss in the secure key rate when dropping one of the monitoring states. Furthermore, it is possible to use only a single monitoring state if the quantum bit error rates are low enough. We apply our formalism to an experimental d=4 time-phase QKD system, where only one monitoring state is transmitted, and obtain a secret key rate of 17.4±2.8 Mbits/s at a 4 dB channel loss and with a quantum bit error rate of 0.045±0.001 and 0.037±0.001 in time and phase bases, respectively, which is 58.4% of the secret key rate that can be achieved with the full setup. This ratio can be increased, potentially up to 100%, if the error rates in time and phase basis are reduced. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to substantially simplify the design of high-dimensional QKD systems, including those that use the spatial or temporal degrees of freedom of the photon, and still outperform qubit-based (d=2) protocols.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 January 2018
  • Revised 9 April 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.042347

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Nurul T. Islam1,*, Charles Ci Wen Lim2,3,†, Clinton Cahall4, Jungsang Kim4,5, and Daniel J. Gauthier6

  • 1Department of Physics and the Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 117583, Singapore
  • 3Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 117543, Singapore
  • 4Department of Electrical Engineering and the Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
  • 5IonQ, Inc., College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, 191 West Woodruff Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

  • *nurul.islam@duke.edu
  • charles.lim@nus.edu.sg

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 4 — April 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×