Excitation of Rydberg wave packets in the tunneling regime

B. Piraux, F. Mota-Furtado, P. F. O'Mahony, A. Galstyan, and Yu. V. Popov
Phys. Rev. A 96, 043403 – Published 3 October 2017

Abstract

In the tunneling regime for strong laser field ionization of atoms, experimental studies have shown that a substantial fraction of atoms survive the laser pulse in many Rydberg states. To explain the origin of such trapping of population into Rydberg states, two mechanisms have been proposed: the first involves ac-Stark-shifted multiphoton resonances, and the second, called frustrated tunneling ionization, leads to the recombination of tunneled electrons into Rydberg states. We use a very accurate spectral method based on complex Sturmian functions to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation for hydrogen in a linearly polarized infrared pulse and to calculate the tunneling probability in terms of the atomic ground-state width. We examine the probability of excitation into Rydberg states as a function of the peak intensity for various pulse durations and two wavelengths, 800 and 1800 nm, and we try to explain the results in light of the two aforementioned mechanisms. For long pulses of 800 nm wavelength, the extreme sensitivity of the trapping of population into high-lying Rydberg states to the peak intensity, the well-defined value, and parity of the angular momentum of the populated Rydberg states and the presence of Freeman resonances can be explained using a multiphotonic excitation mechanism. For strong pulses of 1800 nm wavelength, in the so-called adiabatic or quasistatic tunneling regime, the oscillations of the excitation probability as a function of intensity are in phase opposition to the ionization probability, and we observe a migration toward high values of the angular momentum with different distributions in the angular momentum at the maxima and minima of the oscillations. We also present a detailed study of how the excited-state wave packet builds up in time during the interaction of the atom with the pulse.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 18 April 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.043403

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

B. Piraux1,*, F. Mota-Furtado2, P. F. O'Mahony2, A. Galstyan1, and Yu. V. Popov3,4

  • 1Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2 chemin du cyclotron, Box L7.01.07, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • 2Department of Maths, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
  • 3Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
  • 4Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia

  • *bernard.piraux@uclouvain.be

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 4 — October 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×