• Editors' Suggestion

Fundamental limitations on photoisomerization from thermodynamic resource theories

Nicole Yunger Halpern and David T. Limmer
Phys. Rev. A 101, 042116 – Published 17 April 2020

Abstract

Small, out-of-equilibrium, and quantum systems defy simple thermodynamic expressions. Such systems are exemplified by molecular switches, which exchange heat with a bath. These molecules can photoisomerize, or change conformation, or switch, on absorbing light. The photoisomerization probability depends on kinetic details that couple the molecule's energetics to its dissipation. Therefore, a simple, general, thermodynamic-style bound on the photoisomerization probability seems out of reach. We derive such a bound using a resource theory. The resource-theory framework is a set of mathematical tools, developed in quantum information theory, used to generalize thermodynamics to small and quantum settings. From this toolkit has been derived a generalization of the second law, the thermomajorization preorder. We use thermomajorization to upper-bound the photoisomerization probability. Then, we compare the bound with an equilibrium prediction and with a Lindbladian model. We identify a realistic parameter regime in which the Lindbladian evolution saturates the thermomajorization bound. We also quantify the energy coherence in the electronic degree of freedom, and we argue that this coherence cannot promote photoisomerization. This work illustrates how quantum-information-theoretic thermodynamics can elucidate complex quantum processes in nature, experiments, and synthetics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 9 December 2019
  • Revised 9 March 2020
  • Accepted 13 March 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042116

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & TechnologyInterdisciplinary PhysicsCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsAtomic, Molecular & OpticalStatistical Physics & Thermodynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Nicole Yunger Halpern1,2,3,4,5,* and David T. Limmer6,7,8,†

  • 1Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 2Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 3ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 5Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 6Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 7Kavli Energy NanoSciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 8Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

  • *nicoleyh@g.harvard.edu
  • dlimmer@berkeley.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 4 — April 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×