Ultraviolet to far-infrared dielectric function of n-doped cadmium oxide thin films

J. Ryan Nolen, Evan L. Runnerstrom, Kyle P. Kelley, Ting S. Luk, Thomas G. Folland, Angela Cleri, Jon-Paul Maria, and Joshua D. Caldwell
Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 025202 – Published 28 February 2020
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Spectroscopic ellipsometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were applied to extract the ultraviolet to far-infrared (15033333cm1) complex dielectric functions of high-quality, sputtered indium-doped cadmium oxide (In:CdO) thin crystalline films on MgO substrates possessing carrier densities (Nd) ranging from 1.1×1019cm3 to 4.1×1020cm3. A multiple oscillator fit model was used to identify and analyze the three major contributors to the dielectric function and their dependence on doping density: interband transitions in the visible, free-carrier excitations (Drude response) in the near- to far-infrared, and IR-active optic phonons in the far-infrared. More specifically, values pertinent to the complex dielectric function such as the optical band gap (Eg), are shown here to be dependent upon carrier density, increasing from approximately 2.5–3 eV, while the high-frequency permittivity (ɛ) decreases from 5.6 to 5.1 with increasing carrier density. The plasma frequency (ωp) scales as Nd, resulting in ωp values occurring within the mid- to near-IR, and the effective mass (m*) was also observed to exhibit doping density-dependent changes, reaching a minimum of 0.11mo in unintentionally doped films (1.1×1019cm3). Good quantitative agreement with prior work on polycrystalline, higher-doped CdO films is also demonstrated, illustrating the generality of the results. The analysis presented here will aid in predictive calculations for CdO-based next-generation nanophotonic and optoelectronic devices, while also providing an underlying physical description of the key properties dictating the dielectric response in this atypical semiconductor system.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 26 July 2019
  • Accepted 5 February 2020
  • Corrected 13 August 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.025202

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Corrections

13 August 2020

Correction: A typographical error in the value for C appearing after Eq. (5) has been fixed, with a related change to the key inside Fig. 3(b). The top axis in Fig. 2(a) contained an error and has been resolved.

Authors & Affiliations

J. Ryan Nolen1, Evan L. Runnerstrom2,3, Kyle P. Kelley2, Ting S. Luk4,5, Thomas G. Folland6, Angela Cleri7, Jon-Paul Maria7, and Joshua D. Caldwell6

  • 1Interdisciplinary Materials Science Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • 2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
  • 3Army Research Office, CDCC US Army Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
  • 4Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
  • 5Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
  • 6Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • 7Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 4, Iss. 2 — February 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×