Interplay of phase boundary anisotropy and electro-auto-catalytic surface reactions on the lithium intercalation dynamics in LiXFePO4 plateletlike nanoparticles

Neel Nadkarni, Elisha Rejovitsky, Dimitrios Fraggedakis, Claudio V. Di Leo, Raymond B. Smith, Peng Bai, and Martin Z. Bazant
Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 085406 – Published 16 August 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Experiments on single crystal LiXFePO4 nanoparticles indicate rich nonequilibrium phase behavior, such as suppression of phase separation at high lithiation rates, striped patterns of coherent phase boundaries, and nucleation by binary-solid surface wetting and intercalation waves. These observations have been successfully predicted (prior to the experiments) by one-dimensional (1D) depth-averaged phase-field models, which neglect any subsurface phase separation. In this paper, using an electro-chemo-mechanical phase-field model, we investigate the coherent nonequilibrium subsurface phase morphologies that develop in the ab plane of plateletlike single-crystal plateletlike LiXFePO4 nanoparticles. Finite element 2D plane-stress and plane-strain simulations are performed in the ab plane and validated by 3D simulations, showing similar results. Using a realistic material model from previous work, we show that the anisotropy of the interfacial tension (or gradient penalty) tensor and its relation to electro-auto-catalytic surface intercalation reactions plays a crucial role in determining the subsurface phase morphology. With the standard assumption of an isotropic interfacial tension tensor, subsurface phase separation in the bulk is observed and its morphology is independent of the reaction kinetics at the surface, but for strong anisotropy, phase separation is controlled by surface reactions, as assumed in 1D models. Moreover, the driven intercalation reaction suppresses phase separation during lithiation, while enhancing it during delithiation, by electro-auto-catalysis, in quantitative agreement with in operando imaging experiments in single-crystalline nanoparticles, given measured reaction rate constants.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 26 February 2018
  • Revised 9 June 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.085406

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Neel Nadkarni1, Elisha Rejovitsky1, Dimitrios Fraggedakis1, Claudio V. Di Leo2, Raymond B. Smith1, Peng Bai3, and Martin Z. Bazant1,4,*

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 2School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
  • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA
  • 4Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *bazant@mit.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 2, Iss. 8 — August 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×