Intrinsic sign problem in fermionic and bosonic chiral topological matter

The infamous sign problem leads to an exponential complexity in Monte Carlo simulations of generic many-body quantum systems. Nevertheless, many phases of matter are known to admit a sign-problem-free representative, allowing efficient simulations on classical computers. Motivated by long standing open problems in many-body physics, as well as fundamental questions in quantum complexity, the possibility of intrinsic sign problems, where a phase of matter admits no sign-problem-free representative, was recently raised but remains largely unexplored. Here, we establish the existence of an intrinsic sign problem in a broad class of gapped, chiral, topological phases of matter. Within this class, we exclude the possibility of stoquastic Hamiltonians for bosons (or 'qudits'), and of sign-problem-free determinantal Monte Carlo algorithms for fermions. The intrinsically sign-problematic class of phases we identify is defined in terms of topological invariants with clear observable signatures: the chiral central charge, and the topological spins of anyons. We obtain analogous results for phases that are spontaneously chiral, and present evidence for an extension of our results that applies to both chiral and non-chiral topological matter.


I. INTRODUCTION
The Monte Carlo (MC) technique is one of the most powerful tools for numerically evaluating thermal averages of classical many-body systems, by randomly sampling the phase-space according to the Boltzmann probability distribution [1]. Though the phase-space of an N -body system scales exponentially with N , an MC approximation with a fixed desired error is usually obtained in polynomial time [2,3]. In Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC), one attempts to perform MC computations of thermal averages in quantum many-body systems, by following the heuristic idea that quantum systems in d dimensions are equivalent to classical systems in d + 1 dimensions [4,5].
The difficulty with any such quantum to classical mapping, henceforth referred to as a method, is the infamous sign problem, where the mapping can produce complex, rather than non-negative, Boltzmann weights p, which do not correspond to a probability distribution. Faced with a sign problem, one can try to change the method used and obtain p ≥ 0, thus curing the sign problem [6,7]. Alternatively, one can perform QMC using the weights |p|, which is often done but generically leads to an exponential computational complexity in evaluating physical observables, limiting ones ability to simulate large systems at low temperatures [2].
Conceptually, the sign problem can be understood as an obstruction to mapping quantum systems to classical systems, and accordingly, from a number of complexity theoretic perspectives, a generic curing algorithm in polynomial time is not believed to exist [2,[6][7][8][9][10]. In many-body * omri.golan@weizmann.ac.il physics, however, one is mostly interested in universal phenomena, i.e phases of matter and the transitions between them, and therefore representative Hamiltonians which are sign-free often suffice [11]. In fact, QMC simulations continue to produce unparalleled results, in all branches of many-body quantum physics, precisely because new signfree models are constantly being discovered [5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17].
Designing sign-free models requires design principles (or "de-sign" principles) [11,18] -easily verifiable properties that, if satisfied by a Hamiltonian and method, lead to a sign-free representation of the corresponding partition function. An important example is the condition i| H |j ≤ 0 where i = j label a local basis, which implies non-negative weights p in a wide range of methods [10,11]. Hamiltonians satisfying this condition in a given basis are known as stoquastic [8], and have proven very useful in both application and theory of QMC in bosonic (or spin, or 'qudit') systems [2,[6][7][8][9][10][11].
Fermionic Hamiltonians are not expected to be stoquastic in any local basis [2,5], and alternative methods, collectively known as determinantal quantum Monte-Carlo (DQMC), are therefore used [4,5,17,19,20]. The search for design principles that apply to DQMC, and applications thereof, has naturally played the dominant role in tackling the sign problem in fermionic systems, and has seen a lot of progress in recent years [5,17,18,[21][22][23][24]. Nevertheless, long standing open problems in quantum many-body physics continue to defy solution, and remain inaccessible for QMC. These include the nature of high temperature superconductivity and the associated repulsive Hubbard model [20,[25][26][27], dense nuclear matter and the associated lattice QCD at finite baryon density [28][29][30], and the enigmatic fractional quantum Hall state at filling 5/2 and its associated Coulomb Hamiltonian [31][32][33][34][35][36], all of which are fermionic. arXiv:2005.05566v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 12 May 2020 2 One may wonder if there is a fundamental reason that no design principle applying to the above open problems has so far been found, despite intense research efforts. More generally, Are there phases of matter which do not admit a sign-free representative? Are there physical properties that cannot be exhibited by sign-free models?
We refer to such phases of matter, where the sign problem simply cannot be cured, as having an intrinsic sign problem [9]. From a practical perspective, intrinsic sign problems may prove useful in directing research efforts and computational resources. From a fundamental perspective, intrinsic sign problems identify certain phases of matter as inherently quantum -their physical properties cannot be reproduced by a partition function with positive Boltzmann weights.
To the best of our knowledge, the first intrinsic sign problem was discovered by Hastings [9], who proved that no stoquastic, commuting projector, Hamiltonians exist for the 'doubled semion' phase [37], which is bosonic and topologically ordered. In a parallel work [38], we generalize this result considerably -excluding the possibility of stoquastic Hamiltonians in a broad class of bosonic non-chiral topological phases of matter. Additionally, Reference [39] demonstrated, based on the algebraic structure of edge excitations, that no translationally invariant stoquastic Hamiltonians exist for bosonic chiral topological phases.
In this paper, we establish a new criterion for intrinsic sign problems in chiral topological matter, and take the first step in analyzing intrinsic sign problems in fermionic systems. First, based on the well established 'momentum polarization' method for characterizing chiral topological matter [40][41][42][43][44], we obtain a variant of the result of Ref. [39] -excluding the possibility of stoquastic Hamiltonians in a broad class of bosonic chiral topological phases. We then develop a formalism with which we obtain analogous results for systems comprised of both bosons and fermionsexcluding the possibility of sign-free DQMC simulations.
All of the above mentioned topological phases are gapped, 2+1 dimensional, and described at low energy by a topological field theory [45][46][47]. The class of such phases in which we find an intrinsic sign problem is defined in terms of robust data characterizing them: the chiral central charge c, a rational number, as well as the set {θ a } of topological spins of anyons, a subset of roots of unity. Namely, we find that An intrinsic sign problem exists if e 2πic/24 is not the topological spin of some anyon, i.e e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }.
The above criterion applies to 'most' chiral topological phases, see Table I for examples. In particular, we identify an intrinsic sign problem in 96.7% of the first one-thousand fermionic Laughlin phases, and in all non-abelian Kitaev spin liquids. We also find intrinsic sign problems in 91.6% of the first one-thousand SU (2) k Chern-Simons theories. Since, for k = 1, 2, 4, these allow for universal quantum computation by manipulation of anyons [48,49], our results support the strong belief that quantum computation cannot be simulated with classical resources, in polynomial time [50]. This conclusion is strengthened by examining the Fibonacci anyon model, which is known to be universal for quantum computation [49], and is found to be intrinsically sign-problematic. We stress that both c and {θ a } have clear observable signatures in both the bulk and boundary of chiral topological matter, some of which have been experimentally observed. The chiral central charge controls the boundary thermal Hall conductance [51][52][53][54], which was recently measured in quantum Hall and spin systems [31,[55][56][57]. In the bulk it is predicted to contribute to the Hall (or odd) viscosity at finite wave-vector, as well as in curved background [58][59][60][61]. The chiral central charge also affects the angular momentum at conical defects [62], as was recently observed in an optical realization of integer quantum Hall states [63,64]. The topological spins determine the exchange statistics of anyons, predicted to appear in interferometry experiments [49], though experimental observation remains elusive [65].
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec.II we collect the relevant facts regarding chiral topological matter, arriving at the 'momentum polarization' Eq. (3). Section III then obtains Result 1 -an intrinsic sign problem in bosonic chiral topological matter. In Sec.IV we perform a similar analysis for the case where chirality (or time reversal symmetry breaking), appears spontaneously rather than explicitly, arriving at Result 2. We then turn to fermionic systems. In Sec.V we develop a formalism which unifies and generalizes the currently used DQMC algorithms, and the corresponding design principles. In Sec.VI, we obtain within this formalism Result 1F and Result 2F, the fermionic analogs of Results 1 and 2. Section VII describes a conjectured extension of our results that applies beyond chiral phases, and unifies them with the intrinsic sign problems found in our parallel work [38]. In Sec.VIII we discuss our results and provide an outlook for future work.

II. CHIRAL TOPOLOGICAL MATTER, AND SIGNS FROM GEOMETRIC MANIPULATIONS
In this section we review the necessary details regarding chiral topological phases of matter, and, following Refs. [40][41][42]44], obtain the 'momentum polarization' Eq.(3), which is the main tool we use in the remainder of this paper. Later on we will show that gapped bosonic and fermionic Hamiltonians which are sign-free (due to the an appropriate design principle) cannot obey the aforementioned Eq.(3), unless the chiral central charge and topological spins obey a tight constraint. ∈ {θa}, in terms of the chiral central charge c and the topological spins θa = e 2πiha . We mark bosonic/fermionic phases by (B/F). The -wave superconductor is chiral, e.g p + ip for = 1, and spinless. Data for the spinfull case is identical to that of the Chern insulator, with odd (even) in place of ν, for triplet (singlet) pairing. The modulo 8 ambiguity in the last line corresponds to the stacking of a given realization of the anyon model with copies of the E8 K-matrix phase. A gapped Hamiltonian is said to be in a topological phase of matter if it cannot be deformed to a trivial reference Hamiltonian, without closing the gap. If a symmetry is enforced, only symmetric deformations are considered, and it is additionally required that the symmetry is not spontaneously broken [68,69]. For Hamiltonians defined on a lattice, as considered in this paper, a natural trivial Hamiltonian is given by the atomic limit of decoupled lattice sites, where the symmetry acts independently on each site.

Phase of matter
Topological phases with a unique ground state on the 2-dimensional torus exist only with a prescribed symmetry group, and are termed symmetry protected topological phases (SPTs) [70][71][72]. When such phases are placed on the cylinder, they support anomalous boundary degrees of freedom which cannot be realized on isolated 1-dimensional spatial manifolds, as well as corresponding quantized bulk response coefficients. Notable examples are the integer quantum Hall states, topological insulators, and topological superconductors [73].
Topological phases with a degenerate ground state subspace on the torus are termed topologically ordered, or symmetry enriched if a symmetry is enforced [74,75]. Beyond the phenomena exhibited by SPTs, these support localized quasiparticle excitations with anyonic statistics and fractional charge under the symmetry group. Notable examples are fractional quantum Hall states [49,76], quantum spin liquids [77], and fractional topological insulators [78,79].
In this work we consider chiral topological phases, where the boundary degrees of freedom that appear on the cylinder propagate unidirectionally. At energies small compared with the bulk gap, the boundary can be described by a chiral conformal field theory (CFT) [80,81], while the bulk reduces to a chiral topological field theory (TFT) [46,47], see Fig.1(a). We consider both bosonic and fermionic phases. These may be protected or enriched by an on-site sym-metry, but we will not make use of this symmetry in our analysis -only the chirality of the phase will be used.
A notable example for chiral topological phases is given by Chern insulators [82][83][84]: SPTs protected by the U (1) fermion number symmetry, which admit free-fermion Hamiltonians. The single particle spectrum of a Chern insulator on the cylinder is depicted in Fig.1(b). Another notable example is the topologically ordered Kitaev spin liquid [46,85], which can be described by Majorana fermions with a single particle spectrum similar to Fig.1

Chiral CFT
FIG. 1. Chiral topological phases of matter on the cylinder. (a) The low energy description of a chiral topological phase is comprised of two, counter propagating, chiral conformal field theories (CFTs) on the boundary, and a chiral topological field theory (TFT) in the bulk. (b) Examples: schematic single-particle spectrum of a Chern insulator and of the Majorana fermions describing the Kitaev spin liquid. Assuming discrete translational symmetry with spacing a in the x direction, one can plot the single-particle eigen-energies ε on the cylinder as a function of (quasi) momentum kx. This reveals an integer number of chiral dispersion branches whose eigen-states are supported on one of the two boundary components. In the Chern insulator (Kitaev spin liquid) these correspond to the Weyl (Majorana-Weyl) fermion CFT, with c = ±1 (c = ±1/2) per branch. The velocity, v = |∂ε/∂kx| at the chemical potential µ, is a non-universal parameter.
Note that the velocity v of the boundary CFT is a nonuniversal parameter which generically changes as the microscopic Hamiltonian is deformed. Furthermore, different chiral branches may have different velocities.
The chirality of the boundary CFT and bulk TFT is manifested by their non-vanishing chiral central charge c , which is rational and universal -it is a topological invariant with respect to continuous deformations of the Hamiltonian which preserve the bulk energy gap, and therefore constant throughout a topological phase [46,60,86,87]. On the boundary c is defined with respect to an orientation of the cylinder, so the two boundary components have opposite chiral central charges.

B. Boundary finite size corrections
The non-vanishing of c implies a number of geometric, or 'gravitational', physical phenomena [58-61, 80, 81, 88, 89]. In particular, the boundary supports a non-vanishing energy current J E , which receives a correction at a temperature T > 0, and in the thermodynamic limit L = ∞, where L is the circumference of the cylinder. Note that we set K B = 1 and = 1 throughout. Within CFT, this correction is universal since it is independent of v. Taking the two counter propagating boundary components of the cylinder into account, and placing these at slightly different temperatures, leads to a thermal Hall conductance K H = cπT /6 [51][52][53], a prediction that recently led to the first measurements of c [31,[55][56][57].
In analogy with Eq.(1), the boundary of a chiral topological phase also supports a non-vanishing ground state (at T = 0) momentum density p, which receives a universal correction on a cylinder with finite circumference L < ∞, Equation (2) is the main property of chiral topological matter that we use below, so we discuss it in detail. First, the rational number h 0 is a chiral conformal weight, which is an additional piece of data characterizing the boundary CFT. Like the chiral central charge, the two boundary components of the cylinder have opposite h 0 s. From the bulk TFT perspective, h 0 corresponds to the topological spin of an anyon quasi-particle, defined by the phase θ 0 = e 2πih0 accumulated as the anyon undergoes a 2π rotation [46]. The set {θ a } N a=1 of topological spins of anyons is associated with the N -dimensional ground state subspace on the torus, and the unique θ 0 = e 2πih0 defined by (2) corresponds to the generically unique ground state on the cylinder, with a finite-size energy separation ∼ 1/L from the low lying excited states, see Appendix A.
As the equation θ 0 = e 2πih0 suggests, only h 0 mod 1 is universal for a topological phase. The integer part of h 0 can change as the Hamiltonian is deformed on the cylinder, while maintaining the bulk gap, and even as a function of L for a fixed Hamiltonian. Additionally, the choice of θ 0 from the set {θ a } is non-universal, and can change due to bulk gap preserving deformations, or as a function of L. Both types of discontinuous jumps in h 0 may be accompanied by an accidental degeneracy of the ground state on the cylinder. Therefore, the universal and L-independent statement regarding h 0 is that, apart from accidental degeneracies, e 2πih0 = θ 0 ∈ {θ a } -a fact that will be important in our analysis.
The non-trivial behavior of h 0 described above appears when the boundary corresponds to a non-conformal deformation of a CFT, by e.g a chemical potential. A demonstrated analytically and numerically in Appendix B, such behavior appears already in the simple context of Chern insulators with non-zero Fermi momenta, as would be the case in Fig.1(b) if the chemical potential µ is either raised or lowered.

C. Momentum polarization
In this section we describe a procedure for the extraction of h 0 − c/24 in Eq.(2), given a lattice Hamiltonian on the cylinder. Since the two boundary components carry opposite momentum densities, the ground state on the cylinder does not carry a total momentum, only a 'momentum polarization'. It is therefore clear that some sort of one-sided translation will be required. Following Ref. [40], we defineZ := Tr T R e −βH , which is related to the usual partition function Z = Tr e −βH 5 (β = 1/T ), by the insertion of the operator T R , which translates the right half of the cylinder by one unit cell in the periodic x direction, see Fig.2(a). The objectZ satisfies where N x is the number of sites in the x direction, α ∈ C is non-universal and has a negative real part, and o N −1 x indicates corrections that decay faster than N −1 x as N x → ∞. Equation (3) is valid at temperatures low compared to the finite-size energy differences on the boundary, β −1 = o N −1 x . See Appendix A for the precise relation between Eq.(3) and the momentum polarization of Ref. [40].
From a Hamiltonian perspective,Z/Z is simply the thermal expectation value of the operator T R . However,Z also has a simple interpretation from a space-time perspective, which will be useful in the context of DQMC. The usual partition function Z = Tr e −βH has a functional integral representation in terms of bosonic fields φ (fermionic fields ψ) defined on space, the cylinder C in our case, and the imaginary time circle S 1 β = R/βZ, with periodic (antiperiodic) boundary conditions [90]. InZ = Tr T R e −βH , the insertion of T R produces a twisting of the boundary conditions of φ, ψ in the time direction, such thatZ is the partition function on a space-time carrying a screw dislocation, see Fig.2(b). Geometrically, the space-time on which Z is defined is a fibration of C over S 1 β , whereas Z is defined on the product C × S 1 β . The above space-time interpretation ofZ, supplemented by Eq.(2), allows for an intuitive explanation of Eq.(3), which loosely follows its analytic derivation [40]. As seen in Fig.2(b), the line where T R is discontinuous can be interpreted as an additional boundary component at a high effective temperature, β * L/v. Since the effective temperature is much larger than the finite size energy-differences 2πv/L on the boundary CFT, the screw dislocation contributes no finite size corrections toZ. This leaves only the contribution of the boundary component on the right side of the cylinder, where T R produces the phase e iaLp(L) , assuming β * L/v β. Equation (2) then leads to the universal finite size correction (2πi/N x ) (h 0 − c/24).
Equation (3) follows analytically from the low energy description of chiral topological matter in terms of chiral TFT (and chiral CFT on boundaries) [40], and was numerically scrutinized in a large number of examples in Refs. [40][41][42][43][44], as well as in Appendix B. Nevertheless, we are not aware of a rigorous proof of Eq.(3) for gapped lattice Hamiltonians. Therefore, in stating our results we will use the assumption 'the Hamiltonian H is in a chiral topological phase of matter', the content of which is that H admits a low energy description in terms of a chiral TFT with chiral central charge c and topological spins {θ a }, and in particular, Eq.(3) holds for any bulk-gap preserving deformation of H, with e 2πih0 ∈ {θ a }, apart from accidental ground state degeneracies on the cylinder.

III. EXCLUDING STOQUASTIC HAMILTONIANS FOR CHIRAL TOPOLOGICAL MATTER
In this section we consider bosonic (or 'qudit', or spin) systems, and a single design principle -existence of a local basis in which the many-body Hamiltonian is stoquastic. A sketch of the derivation of Result 1 is that the momentum polarizationZ is positive for Hamiltonians H which are stoquastic in an on-site and homogenous basis, and this implies that θ 0 = e 2πic/24 for any Hamiltonian H obtained from H by conjugation with a local unitary.

A. Setup
The many body Hilbert space is given by H = ⊗ x∈X H x , where the tensor product runs over the sites x = (x, y) of a 2-dimensional lattice X, and H x are on-site 'qudit' Hilbert spaces of finite dimension d ∈ N. With finite-size QMC simulations in mind, we consider a square lattice with spacing 1, N x ×N y sites, and periodic boundary conditions, so that X = Z Nx × Z Ny is a discretization of the flat torus (R/N x Z)×(R/N y Z). Generalization to other 2-dimensional lattices is straight forward. On this Hilbert space a gapped r-local Hamiltonian H = x H x is assumed to be given. Here the terms H x are supported within a range r of xthey are defined on ⊗ |y−x|≤r H y and act as 0 on all other qudits.
Fix an tensor product basis |s = ⊗ x∈X |s x , labeled by strings s = (s x ) x∈X , where s x ∈ {1, · · · , d} labels a basis |s x for H x . For any vector d ∈ X, the corresponding translation operator T d is defined in this basis, T d |s = t d s , with t d s x = s x+d . These statements assert that |s is both an on-site and a homogeneous basis, or on-site homogenous for short. Note that T d acts as a permutation matrix on the |s s, and in particular, has non-negative matrix elements in this basis.
We assume that H is locally stoquastic: it is term-wise stoquastic in a local basis. This means that a local unitary operator U exists, such that the conjugated Hamiltonian H = U HU † is a sum of local terms H x = U H x U † , which have non-positive matrix elements in the on-site homogeneous basis, s| H x |s ≤ 0 for all basis states |s , |s . Note that we include the diagonal matrix elements in the definition, without loss of generality.
The term local unitary used above refers to a depth-D quantum circuit, a product U = U D · · · U 1 where each U i is itself a product of unitary operators with non-overlapping supports 1 of diameter w. It follows that H has a range r = r + 2r U , where r U = Dw is the range of U . Equivalently, we may take U to be a finite-time evolution with respect 6 to anr-local, smoothly time-dependent, HamiltonianH (t), given by the time-ordered exponential U = TOe −i 1 0H (t)dt . The two types of locality requirements are equivalent, as finite-time evolutions can be efficiently approximated by finite-depth circuits, while finite-depth circuits can be written as finite-time evolutions over time D with piecewise constant w-local Hamiltonians [69,91].

B. Constraining c and {θa}
In order to discuss the momentum polarization, we need to map the stoquastic Hamiltonian H from the torus X to a cylinder C. This is done by choosing a translation vector d ∈ X, and then cutting the torus X along a line l parallel to d. The vector d is chosen such that such that T d corresponds to a translation in the low energy TQFT description. In particular, a lattice translation may permute the anyon types a 2 . Since the number of anyons is finite, using a large enough translation will eliminate this effect. An example is given by Wen's plaquette model [92], where different anyons are placed on the even/odd sites of a bipartite lattice, and a translation that maps the even (odd) sites to themselves will be chosen. To simplify the presentation we restrict attention to the case d = (1, 0), where T d = T (and in the following T d R = T R ). All other cases amount to a lattice-spacing redefinition, see Appendix C. The cylinder C = Z Nx × {1, . . . , N y } is then obtained from the torus X = Z Nx × Z Ny by cutting along the line l = {(i, 1/2) : i ∈ Z Nx }. A stoquastic Hamiltonian on the cylinder can be obtained from that on the torus by removing all local terms H x whose support overlaps l, see Fig.3. Note that this procedure may render H acting as 0 on certain qudits H x with x within a range r of l, but this does not bother us. Since all terms H x are individually stoquastic, this procedure leaves H , now defined on the cylinder, stoquastic. One can similarly map H and U to the cylinder C such that the relation H = U HU † remains valid on C.
Cutting the torus to a cylinder along the line l. Orange areas mark the supports of Hamiltonian terms H x which are removed from H , while blue areas mark the supports of terms which are kept. 2 We thank Michael Levin for pointing out this phenomenon.
Let us now make contact with the momentum polarization Eq.(3). Having mapped H to the cylinder, we consider the 'partition function' where T R is defined by T R |s = |T R s , (T R s) x,y = s x+Θ(y),y , and Θ is a heavy side function supported on the right half of the cylinder. ThoughZ is generally different fromZ = Tr e −βH T R appearing in Eq. (3), it satisfies two useful properties: 1.Z > 0. Both −H and T R have non-negative entries in the on-site basis |s , and therefore so does e −βH T R .
, as a deformation from H to H which maintains locality and preserves the bulk-gap. Moreover, the full spectrum on the cylinder is λ-independent, and therefore so is h 0 .
Combining Eq. (3), for H instead of H, with the two above properties leads to where := Im (α ) is generally different from = Im (α) of Eq. (3) since H = H. The non-universal integer part of h 0 can then be eliminated by raising Eq.(5) to the N x th power, where we used θ 0 = e 2πih0 , and o (1) → 0 as N x → ∞. We also indicated explicitly the possible N x -dependence of θ 0 , as described in Sec.II B. We proceed under the assumption that no accidental degeneracies occur on the cylinder, so that θ 0 (N x ) ∈ {θ a } for all N x , deferring the degenerate case to Appendix D. Now, for rational = n/m, the series e 2πi N 2 x (N x ∈ N) covers periodically a subset S of the mth roots of unity, including 1 ∈ S. On the other hand, for irrational the series e 2πi N 2 x is dense in the unit circle. Combined with the fact that θ 0 (N x ) is valued in the finite set {θ a }, while c is N x -independent, Equation (6) implies that must be rational, and that the values attained by θ 0 (N x ) e −2πic/24 cover the set S periodically, for large enough N x . It follows that 1 ∈ S ⊂ θ a e −2πic/24 . We therefore have

Result 1: If a local bosonic Hamiltonian H is both locally
stoquastic and in a chiral topological phase of matter, then one of the corresponding topological spins satisfies θ a = e 2πic/24 . Equivalently, a bosonic chiral topological phase of matter where e 2πic/24 is not the topological spin of some anyon, i.e e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, admits no local Hamiltonians which are locally stoquastic.
The above result can be stated in terms of the topological T-matrix, which is the representation of a Dehn twist on the torus ground state subspace, and has the spectrum Spec (T) = θ a e −2πic/24 a [40,41,45,46,76,93].

Result 1': If a local bosonic
Hamiltonian H is is both locally stoquastic and in a chiral topological phase of matter, then the corresponding T-matrix satisfies 1 ∈ Spec (T). Equivalently, a bosonic chiral topological phase of matter where 1 / ∈ Spec (T), admits no local Hamiltonians which are locally stoquastic.
The above result is our main statement for bosonic phases of matter. The logic used in its derivation will be extended in the following sections, where we generalize Result 1 to systems which are fermionic, spontaneously-chiral, or both.

IV. SPONTANEOUS CHIRALITY
The invariants h 0 and c change sign under both time reversal T and parity (spatial reflection) P, and therefore require a breaking of T and P down to PT to be nonvanishing. The momentum polarization Eq.(3) is valid if this symmetry breaking is explicit, i.e H does not commute with P and T separately. Here we consider the case where H is P, T -symmetric, but these are broken down to PT spontaneously, as in e.g intrinsic topological superfluids and superconductors [61,94,95]. We first generalize Eq.(3) to this setting, and then use this generalization to obtain a spontaneously-chiral analog of Result 1.
Note that the physical time-reversal T is an on-site antiunitary operator acting identically on all qudits, which implies [T , T R ] = 0, while P is a unitary operator that maps the qudit at x to that at P x, where P is the nontrivial element in O (2) /SO (2), e.g (x, y) → (−x, y).

A. Momentum polarization for spontaneously-chiral Hamiltonians
For simplicity, we begin by assuming that H is 'classically symmetry breaking' -it has two exact ground states on the cylinder, already at finite system sizes. We therefore have two ground states |± , such that |− is obtained from |+ by acting with either T or P. In particular, |± have opposite values of h 0 and c. The β → ∞ density matrix is then e −βH /Z = (ρ + + ρ − ) /2, where ρ ± = |± ±|, and this modifies the right hand side of Eq.(3) to its real part, where −δ ± 2πi are the values of the non-universal α obtained from Eq.(3), by replacing e −βH by ρ ± . Indeed, it follows from [T , T R ] = 0 that if two density matrices are related by ρ − = T ρ + T −1 , thenZ ± := Z ± Tr (T R ρ + ) are complex conjugates,Z − =Z * + . Now, for a generic symmetry breaking Hamiltonian H, exact ground state degeneracy happens only in the infinite volume limit [96]. At finite size, the two lowest lying eigenvalues of H would be separated by an exponentially small [69].
One can think of these statements as resulting from the existence of a bulk-gap preserving and T , P-symmetric deformation of H to a 'classically symmetry breaking' Hamiltonian 3 . In this generic setting we have and, following our treatment of the local unitary U in the previous section, Equation (7) remains valid, with modified δ, , but unchanged h 0 − c/24. This statement holds for temperatures much higher than ∆E and much smaller that the CFT energy spacing ∝ N −1 Sec.II C). Note that the universal content of Eq. (7) is the absolute value |h 0 − c/24|, since the cosine is even and sgn ( ) is non-universal.

B. Constraining c and {θa}
Let us now assume that a gapped and local Hamiltonian H is T ,P-symmetric, and is locally stoquastic, due to a unitary U . It follows thatZ = Tr T R e −βH > 0, where H = U HU † . If U happens to be T ,P-symmetric, then so is H , and Eq.(7) holds forZ , with δ , in place of δ, . For a general U , we have The canonical example is the transverse field Ising model Exact ground state degeneracy appears at finite Nx only for g = 0, though spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs for all |g| < 1, where a splitting ∼ |g| Nx appears.

8
where U W need not be T ,P-symmetric. As result,Z satisfies a weaker form of Eq. (7), where δ + , + may differ from δ − , − , and we also indicated the positivity ofZ . Now, if δ + = δ − , one of the chiral contributions is exponentially suppressed relative to the other as N x → ∞, and we can apply the analysis of Sec.III. If in analogy with Eq.(5).Unlike Eq.(5), taking the N x th power of this equation does not eliminate the mod 1 ambiguity in h 0 . This corresponds to the fact that, as opposed to explicitly chiral systems, stacking copies of a spontaneously chiral system does not increase its net chirality. One can replace T R inZ with a larger half-translation T m R , which would multiply the argument of the cosine by m. However, since the largest translation on the cylinder is obtained for m ≈ N x /2, this does not eliminate the mod 1 ambiguity in h 0 . Moreover, even if it so happens that In order to make progress, we make use of the bagpipes construction illustrated in Fig.4. We attach M identical cylinders, or 'pipes', to the given lattice, and act with T R on these cylinders. The global topology of the given lattice is unimportant -all that is needed is a large enough disk in which the construction can be applied. The construction does require some form of homogeneity in order to have a unique extension of the Hamiltonian H to the pipes, and which will be identical for all pipes. We will assume a strict translation symmetry with respect to a sub-lattice, but we believe that this assumption can be relaxed. 4. Bagpipes construction. We attach M identical cylinders, or 'pipes', to the given lattice, and define the half translation TR to act on their top halves, as indicated by blue arrows. The contributions of the pipes to the momentum polarization adds, producing the factor M in Eq.(12).
The resulting surface, shown in Fig.4, has negative curvature at the base of each pipe, which requires a finite number of lattice disclinations in this region. In order to avoid any possible ambiguity in the definition of H at a disclination, one can simply remove any local term H x whose support contains a disclination, which amounts to puncturing a hole around each disclination. The resulting boundary components do not contribute to the momentum polarization since T R acts on these as the identity.
With the construction at hand, the identical contributions of all cylinders toZ add, which implies where we indicate explicitly the possible N x -dependence of θ 0 . This is the spontaneously chiral analog of Eq. (6), and can be analyzed similarly. Since θ 0 (N x ) is valued in the finite set {θ a }, both ± must be rational, ± = n ± /m ± . Restricting then to N x = n x m + m − , such that e 2πi ± N 2 x = 1, and θ 0 attains a constant value θ a for large enough n x , we have for some anyon a. Repeating the analysis with k times more pipes M = kN x , replaces θ a e −2πic/24 in Eq. (14) with its kth power, for all k ∈ N. This infinite set of equations then implies θ a e −2πic/24 = 1. To summarize, Result 2: If a local bosonic Hamiltonian H is both locally stoquastic and in a spontaneously-chiral topological phase of matter, then one of the corresponding topological spins satisfies θ a = e 2πic/24 . Equivalently, a bosonic spontaneously-chiral topological phase of matter where e 2πic/24 is not the topological spin of some anyon, i.e e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, admits no local Hamiltonians which are locally stoquastic.
This extends Result 1 beyond explicitly-chiral Hamiltonians, and clarifies that the essence of the intrinsic sign problem we find is the macroscopic, physically observable, condition e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, as opposed to the microscopic absence (or presence) of time reversal and reflection symmetries. In order to obtain fermionic analogs of the bosonic results of the previous sections, we first need to establish a framework in which such results can be obtained. In this section we develop a formalism that unifies and generalizes the currently used DQMC algorithms and design principles, and implement within it the geometric manipulations used in previous sections, in a sign-free manner. Since we wish to treat the wide range of currently known DQMC algorithms and design principles on equal footing, the discussion will be more abstract than the simple setting of locally stoquastic Hamiltonians used above. In particular, Sections V A-V B lead up to the definition of locally sign-free DQMC, which is our fermionic analog of a locally stoquastic Hamiltonian. This definition is used later on in Sec.VI to formulate Result 1F and Result 2F, the fermionic analogs of Results 1 and 2. The new tools needed to establish these results are the sign-free geometric manipulations described in Sec.V D.

A. Local DQMC
In the presence of bosons and fermions, the many-body Hilbert space is given by The product is taken with respect to a fixed ordering of fermion species α ∈ {1, · · · , d F } and lattice sites x ∈ X. We will also make use of the single-fermion space y is the system size. As in Sec.III, H B is a many-qudit Hilbert space with local dimension d. It can also be a bosonic Fock space where d = ∞.
We consider local fermion-boson Hamiltonians H, of the form where the free-fermion Hermitian matrix h x,y 0 is r 0 -local, it vanishes unless |x − y| ≤ r 0 , and we suppress, here and in the following, the fermion species indices. The Hamiltonian H I describes all possible r 0 -local interactions which preserve the fermion parity (−1) where K x,y B (for all x, y ∈ X) is a local bosonic operator with range r 0 , and vanishes unless |x − y| ≤ r 0 , and similarly for V x,y,z,w B , which vanishes unless x, y, z, w are contained in a disk or radius r 0 . In Eq.(15) dots represent additional pairing terms of the form as well as terms with a higher number of fermions, all of which are r 0 -local and preserve the fermion parity.
Since locality is defined in terms of anti-commuting Fermi operators, a local stoquastic basis is not expected to exist, and accordingly, the sign problem appears in any QMC method in which the Boltzmann weights are given in terms of Hamiltonian matrix elements in a local basis [2,5]. For this reason, the methods used to perform QMC in the presence of fermions are distinct from the ones used in their absence. These are collectively referred to as DQMC [4,5,17,19,20], and lead to the imaginary time path integral representation of the partition function Z = Tr e −βH , involving a bosonic field φ with an action S φ , and a fermionic (grassmann valued) field ψ, with a quadratic ac- In the third line of Eq. (17) we assumed the Hamiltonian form D φ = ∂ τ +h φ(τ ) , and used a standard identity for the determinant in terms of the single-fermion imaginary-time evolution operator [19], where TO denotes the time ordering. The field φ (ψ) is defined on a continuous imaginary-time circle τ ∈ R/βZ, with periodic (anti-periodic) boundary conditions, and on the spatial lattice X. The second and third lines of Eq.(17) define the Monte Carlo phase space {φ} and Boltzmann weight In applications, the DQMC representation (17) may be obtained from the Hamiltonian H in a number of ways. If a Yukawa type model is assumed as a starting point [17], i.e Alternatively, the representation (17) may be obtained through a Hubbard-Stratonovich decoupling and/or a series expansion of fermionic self-interactions [18,21,97]. Such is the case e.g when there are no bosons H = H F , and To take into account and generalize the above relations between H and the corresponding DQMC representation, we will only assume (i) that the effective single-fermion Hamiltonian h φ(τ ) reduces to the free fermion matrix h (0) in the absence of φ, i.e h φ(τ )=0 = h 0 , (ii) that the boson field φ is itself an r 0 -local object 4 , and (iii) that the r 0 -locality of h 0 and H I implies the r-locality of S φ and h φ(τ ) , where r is some function of r 0 , independent of system size. The physical content of these assumptions is that the fields ψ and operators f correspond to the same physical fermion 5 , and that the boson φ mediates all fermionic interactions H I , and therefore corresponds to both the physical bosons in H B and to composite objects made of an even number of fermions within a range r 0 (e.g a Cooper pair φ ∼ f f ).
We can therefore write where each term S φ;τ,x depends only on the values of φ at points (x , τ ) with |τ − τ | , |x − x | ≤ r, and similarly, each term h φ(τ );x is supported on a disk of radius r around x, and depends on the values of φ (τ ) at points x within this disk. Note that even though H is Hermitian, we do not assume the same for h φ(τ ) . Non-Hermitian h φ(τ ) s naturally arise in Hubbard-Stratonovich decouplings, see e.g [18,98]. Even when h φ(τ ) is Hermitian for all φ, its time-dependence implies that U φ is non-Hermitian, and therefore Det (I + U φ ) in Eq. (18) is generically complex valued [19]. This is the generic origin of the sign problem in DQMC. Section V B below describes the notion of fermionic design principles, algebraic conditions on U φ implying Det (I + U φ ) ≥ 0, and defines what it means for such design principles to be local and homogenous.
In the following analysis, we exclude the case of 'classically-interacting fermions', where φ is timeindependent and h φ is Hermitian. In this case the fermionic weight Det I + e −βh φ is trivially non-negative, and signfree DQMC is always possible, provided S φ ∈ R. We view such models as 'exactly solvable', on equal footing with freefermion and commuting projector models. Given a phase of matter, the possible existence of exactly solvable models is independent of the possible existence of sign-free models. Even when an exactly solvable model exists, QMC simulations are of interest for generic questions, such as phase transitions due to deformations of the model [99]. In particular, Ref. [100] utilized a classically-free description of Kitaev's honeycomb model to obtain the thermal Hall conductance and chiral central charge, which should be contrasted with the intrinsic sign problem we find in the corresponding phase of matter, see Table I and Sec.VI.
r 0 , such as links, plaquettes etc., to a fixed vector space C k . Additionally, the φ integration in (17) runs over all such functions. As an example, restricting to constant functions φ leads to non-local all to all interactions between fermions. 5 Technically, via the fermionic coherent state construction of the functional integral [90].

B. Local and homogenous fermionic design principles
The representation (17) is sign-free if p (φ) = e −S φ Det (I + U φ ) ≥ 0 for all φ. A design principle then amounts to a set of polynomially verifiable properties 6 of S φ and h φ(τ ) that guarantee that the complex phase of Det (I + U φ ) is opposite to that of e −S φ . For the sake of presentation, we restrict attention to the case where S φ is manifestly real valued, and Det (I + U φ ) ≥ 0 due to an algebraic condition on the operator U φ , which we write as U φ ∈ C U . This is assumed to follow from an algebraic condition on h φ(τ ) , written as h φ(τ ) ∈ C h , manifestly satisfied for all φ (τ ). The set C h is assumed to be closed under addition, while C U is closed under multiplication: The simplest example, where C U = C h is the set of matrices obeying a fixed time reversal symmetry, is discussed in Sec.V C. In Appendix F we review all other design principles known to us, demonstrate that most of them are of the simplified form above, and generalize our arguments to those that are not. Comparing with the bosonic Hamiltonians treated in Sec.III, we note that C h is analogous to the set of stoquastic Hamiltonians H in a fixed basis, while C U is analogous to the resulting set of matrices e −βH with non-negative entries.
Design principles, as defined above (and in the literature), are purely algebraic conditions, which carry no information about the underlying geometry of space-time. However, as demonstrated in Sec.V C, in order to allow for local interactions, mediated by an r 0 -local boson φ, a design principle must also be local in some sense. We will adopt the following definitions, which are shown to be satisfied by all physical applications of design principles that we are aware of, in Sec.V C and Appendix F.
Definition (term-wise sign-free): We say that a DQMC representation is term-wise sign-free due to a design principle C h , if each of the local terms S φ;τ,x , h φ(τ );x obey the design principle separately, rather than just they sums S φ , h φ(τ ) . Thus S φ;τ,x is real valued, and h φ(τ );x ∈ C h , for all τ, x. This is analogous to the requirement in Sec.III A that H be term-wise stoquastic. Note that even when a DQMC representation is term-wise sign-free, the resulting Boltzmann weights p (φ) are sign-free in a non-local manner: Det (I + U φ ) involves the values of φ at all space-time points, and splitting the determinant into a product of local 11 terms by the Leibniz formula reintroduces signs, which capture the fermionic statistics. In this respect, the "classical" Boltzmann weights p (φ) are always non-local in DQMC.
Definition (on-site homogeneous design principle): A design principle is said to be on-site homogenous if any permutation of the lattice sites σ ∈ S X obeys it. That is, the operator viewed as a single-fermion imaginary-time evolution operator, obeys the design principle, O (σ) ∈ C U , for all σ ∈ S X .
This amounts to the statement that the design principle treats all lattice sites on equal footing, since it follows that It may be that a design principle is on-site only with respect to a sub-lattice X ⊂ X. In this case we simply treat X as the spatial lattice, and add the finite set X/X to the d F internal degrees of freedom. Comparing with Sec.III A, on-site homogenous design principles are analogous to the set of Hamiltonians H which are stoquastic in an on-site homogenous basis -any qudit permutation operator has non-negative entries in this basis, like the imaginary time evolution e −βH .
With these two notions of locality and homogeneity in design principles, we now define the DQMC analog of locally stoquastic Hamiltonians (see Sec.III).
Definition (locally sign-free DQMC): Given a local fermion-boson Hamiltonian H, we say that H allows for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation, if there exists a local unitary U , such that H = U HU † has a local DQMC representation (17), which is term-wise sign-free due to an on-site homogeneous design principle.
Note that the DQMC representation (17) is not of the Hamiltonian but of the partition function, and clearly Z = Tr e −βH = Tr e −βH = Z. What the above definition entails, is that it is H , rather than H, from which the DQMC data S φ , h φ(τ ) is obtained, as described in Sec.V A. This data is then assumed to be term-wise signfree due to an on-site homogeneous design principle. The local unitary U appearing in the above definition is generally fermionic [101]: it can be written as a finite time evolution U = TOe −i 1 0H (t)dt , whereH is a local fermionboson Hamiltonian, which is either piecewise-constant or smooth as a function of t, c.f Sec.III A.

C. Example: time reversal design principle
To demonstrate the above definitions in a concrete setting, consider the time-reversal design principle, defined by an anti-unitary operator T acting on the single-fermion Hilbert space H 1F ∼ = C |X| ⊗ C dF , such that T 2 = −I. The set C h contains all T-invariant matrices, T, h φ(τ ) = 0. It follows that [T, U φ ] = 0, so that C U = C h in this case, and this implies Det (I + U φ ) ≥ 0 [28,98].
A sufficient condition on T that guarantees that the design principle it defines is on-site homogenous is that it is of the form T 0 = I |X| ⊗ t, where I |X| is the identity matrix on C |X| , and t is an anti-unitary on C dF that squares to −I d F . Equivalently, T is block diagonal, with identical blocks t corresponding to the lattice sites x ∈ X. It is then clear that the permutation matrices O (σ) defined in Eq. (20) commute with T, so O (σ) ∈ C U for all σ ∈ S X . Note that the design principle T may correspond to a physical time-reversal T , discussed in Sec.IV, only if it is on-site homogenous, which is why we distinguish the two in our notation.
Additionally, if the operator T is r T -local with some range r T ≥ 0, then any local h φ(τ ) which is sign-free due to T can be made term-wise sign-free. Indeed, if T, h φ(τ ) = 0 then whereh φ(τ );x is now supported on a disk of radius r + 2r T and commutes with T, for all x. We see that the specific notion of r T -locality coincides with the general notion of 'term-wise sign free'. In particular, T = T 0 has a range r T = 0, and can therefore be applied term-wise.
The above statements imply that if T = uT 0 u † , where u is a single-fermion local unitary, and H has a local DQMC representation which is sign-free due to T, then H allows for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation. Indeed, extending u to a many-body local unitary U , we see that H = U HU † admits a local DQMC representation where T 0 , h φ(τ ) = 0. Since T 0 is on-site homogenous, and h φ(τ ) can be assumed term-wise sign-free (see Eq.(21)), we have the desired result. As demonstrated in Appendix F, much of the above analysis carries over to other known design principles.
All realizations of T presented in Ref. [98] in the context of generalized Hubbard models, and in Ref. [17] in the context of quantum critical metals, have the on-site homogeneous form T 0 , and therefore correspond to locally sign-free DQMC simulations.
x y k x π/a −π/a 0 k ε μ k l π /a −π /a k u 0 The latter example is clearly non-local, and we use it to demonstrate the necessity of locality in design principles. As discussed in Sec.IV, the breaking of P and T down to PT actually defines the notion of chirality, and therefore PT is a natural symmetry in chiral topological matter. Accordingly, the design principle T = P (0) T (1/2) applies to a class of models for chiral topological phases, see Appendix E. This seems to allow, from the naive algebraic perspective, for a sign-free DQMC simulation of certain chiral topological phases. However, the weights p (φ) will only be non-negative for bosonic configurations φ which are is invariant under T = P (0) T (1/2) . Restricting the φ integration in Eq. (17) to such configurations leads to non-local interactions between fermions ψ, coupling the points (x, y) and (−x, y). These interactions effectively fold the non-local chiral system into a local non-chiral system of half of space, see Fig.5. Thus, T = P (0) T (1/2) does not allow for sign-free DQMC simulations of chiral topological matter.

D. Sign-free geometric manipulations in DQMC
Let Z be a partition function in a local DQMC form (17), on the discrete torus X = Z Nx × Z Ny and imaginary time circle S 1 β = R/βZ, which is term-wise sign-free due to an on-site homogenous design principle. In this section we show that it is possible to cut X to the cylinder C, and subsequently introduce a screw dislocation in the space-time C×S 1 β , which corresponds to the momentum polarization (3), while maintaining the DQMC weights p (φ) non-negative.

Introducing spatial boundaries
Given a translation T d (d ∈ X), we can cut the torus X along a line l parallel to d, and obtain a cylinder C where T d acts as a translation within each boundary component, as in Sec.III. Given the QMC representation (17), the corresponding representation on C is obtained by eliminating all local terms S φ;τ,x , h φ(τ );x whose support overlaps l, as in Fig.3. This procedure may render S φ , h φ(τ ) independent of certain degrees of freedom φ (x, τ ) , ψ (x, τ ), with x within a range r of l, in which case we simply remove such degrees of freedom from the functional integral (17) 7 . Since S φ;τ,x , h φ(τ );x obey the design principle for every x, τ , the resulting S φ , h φ(τ ) still obey the design principle and the weights p (φ) remain real and non-negative.

Introducing a screw dislocation in space-time
Let us now restrict attention to d = (1, 0), and make contact with the momentum polarization (3). Given a partition function on the space-time C × S 1 β , consider twisting the boundary conditions in the time direction, ψ τ +β,x,y = −ψ τ,x−λΘ(y),y .
Note that λ ∈ Z Nx , since x ∈ Z Nx . In particular, the full twist λ = N x is equivalent to the untwisted case λ = 0, which is equivalent to the statement that the modular parameter of the torus is defined mod 1 (see e.g example 8.2 of [102]). The case λ = 0 gives the standard boundary conditions, where the partition function is, in Hamiltonian terms, just Z = Tr e −βH . In this case Z > 0 since H is Hermitian, though its QMC representation Z = φ p (φ) will generically involve complex valued weights p. The twisted case λ = 1 includes the insertion of the half-translation operatorZ which appears in the momentum polarization (3). Since T R is unitary rather than hermitian,Z itself will generically be complex. However, Claim: If Z has a DQMC representation (17), with p (φ) ≥ 0 term-wise due to an on-site homogeneous design principle C U , thenZ has a QMC representationZ = φp (φ), withp (φ) ≥ 0. In particular,Z ≥ 0. Proof of the claim is provided below. It revolves around two physical points: (i) For the boson φ, we only use the fact that all boundary conditions, and those in Eq. (22) in particular, are locally invisible. (ii) For the fermion ψ, the local invisibility of boundary conditions does not suffice, and the important point is that translations do not act on internal degrees of freedom, and therefore correspond to permutations of the lattice sites. The same holds for the half translation T R . This distinguishes translations from internal symmetries, as well as from all other spatial symmetries, which involve point group elements, and generically act non-trivially on internal degrees of freedom. For example, a C 4 rotation will act non-trivially on spin-full fermions.
Proof: We first consider the fermionic part of the Boltzmann weight, Det (I + U φ ). The Hamiltonian h φ(τ ) depends on the values of φ at a single time slice τ , and is therefore unaffected by the twist in bosonic boundary conditions. It follows that U φ is independent of the twist in bosonic boundary conditions. On the other hand, the fermionic boundary conditions in (22) correspond to a change of the time evolution operator U φ → T R U φ , in analogy with (23). Since the C U is on-site, and T R = O (σ) is a permutation operator, with σ : (x, y) → (x + Θ (y) , y), we have T R U φ ∈ C U , and Det (I + T R U φ ) ≥ 0.
Let us now consider the bosonic part of the Boltzmann weight e −S φ , where each of the local terms S φ;τ,x is manifestly real valued for all φ. We assume that the imaginary time circle S 1 β is discretized, such that the total number of space-time points (τ, x) = u ∈ U is finite. Such a discretization is common in DQMC algorithms [19,21], and the continuum case can be obtained by taking the appropriate limit. The term S φ;τ,x can then be written as a composition f • g V , where f is a real valued function, and g V : (φ u ) u∈U → (φ u ) u∈V chooses the values of φ on which S φ;τ,x depends, where V ⊂ U is the support of S φ;τ,x . The bosonic boundary conditions (22) then amount to a modification of the support V → V λ , as depicted in Fig.6, but not of the function f , which remains real valued. In particular, for λ = 1 we have S φ;τ,x →S φ;τ,x = f •g V1 , and S φ →S φ = τ,xS φ;τ,x ∈ R. Combining the above conclusions for the bosonic and fermionic parts ofp (φ) = e −S φ Det (I + T R U φ ), we find thatp (φ) ≥ 0 for all φ. 6. Implementing the bosonic boundary conditions (22). The lattice lies in the x − τ plane, at y > 0 where the boundary conditions are non trivial. The orange area marks the support, of diameter r, of a local term S φ;τ,x which is unaffected by the boundary conditions. Blue areas correspond to the support of a local term which is affected by the boundary conditions, with pale blue indicating the un-twisted case λ = 0.

VI. EXCLUDING SIGN-FREE DQMC FOR CHIRAL TOPOLOGICAL MATTER
We are now ready to demonstrate the existence of an intrinsic sign problem in chiral topological matter comprised of bosons and fermions, using the machinery of Sections III-V.
Let H be a gapped local fermion-boson Hamiltonian on the discrete torus, which allows for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation. Unpacking the definition, this means that H = U HU † has a local DQMC representation which is term-wise sign-free due to an on-site homogeneous design principle. As shown in Sec.V D, this implies that Z := Tr T R e −βH , written on the cylinder, also has a local DQMC representation, obeying a local and on-site design principle, and as a result,Z > 0. Now, as shown in Sec.III, the positivity ofZ implies θ a = e 2πic/24 for some anyon a. We therefore have the fermionic version of Result 1,

Result 1F: If a local fermion-boson Hamiltonian H, which
is in a chiral topological phase of matter, allows for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation, then one of the corresponding topological spins satisfies θ a = e 2πic/24 . Equivalently, a chiral topological phase of matter where e 2πic/24 is not the topological spin of some anyon, i.e e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, admits no local fermion-boson Hamiltonians for which locally signfree DQMC simulation is possible.
As shown in Sec.IV, the positivity ofZ implies θ a = e 2πic/24 for some anyon a, even if chirality appears only spontaneously. We therefore obtain the fermionic version of Result 2,

Result 2F: If a local fermion-boson Hamiltonian H, which
is in a spontaneously-chiral topological phase of matter, allows for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation, then one of the corresponding topological spins satisfies θ a = e 2πic/24 . Equivalently, a spontaneouslychiral topological phase of matter where e 2πic/24 is not the topological spin of some anyon, i.e e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, admits no local fermion-boson Hamiltonians which allow for a locally sign-free DQMC simulation.
In stating these results, we do not restrict to fermionic phases, because bosonic phases may admit a fermionic description, for which DQMC is of interest. When a bosonic phase admits a fermionic description, the bosonic field φ in Eq.(17) will contain a Z 2 gauge field that couples to the fermion parity (−1) N f of ψ. An important series of examples is given by the non-abelian Kitaev spin liquids, which admit a description in terms of gapped Majorana fermions with an odd Chern number ν, coupled to a Z 2 gauge field [46]. As described in Table I, the criterion e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a } applies to the Kitaev spin liquid, for all ν ∈ 2Z − 1. Result 1 then excludes the possibility of locally stoquastic Hamiltonians for the microscopic description in terms of spins, while Result 1F excludes the possibility of locally sign-free DQMC simulations in the emergent fermionic description.

VII. CONJECTURES: BEYOND CHIRAL MATTER
In Sections III-VI we established a criterion for the existence of intrinsic sign problems in chiral topological matter: if e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, or equivalently 1 / ∈ Spec (T) (see Result 1'), then an intrinsic sign problem exists. Even if taken at face value, this criterion never applies to non-chiral bosonic topological phases, where c = 0, due to the vacuum topological spin 1 ∈ {θ a }. The same statement applies to all bosonic phases with c ∈ 24Z. In this section we propose a refined criterion for intrinsic sign problems in topological matter, which non-trivially applies to both chiral and nonchiral cases, and also unifies the results of this paper with those obtained by other means in our parallel work [38].
Reference [103] proposed the 'universal wave-function overlap' method for characterizing topological order from any basis {|i } for the ground state subspace of a local gapped Hamiltonian H on the torus X. The method is based on the conjecture where A is the area of the torus, α T is a non-universal complex number with non-negative real part, the microscopic Dehn-twist operator T m implements the Dehn twist (x, y) → (x + y, y) on the Hilbert space, and T ij are the entries of the topological T-matrix that characterizes the phase of H, in the basis {|i }. The same statement applies to any element M of the mapping class group of the torus, isomorphic to SL (2, Z), with M in place of T in Eq. (24). The non-universal exponential suppression of the overlap is expected because M m will not generically map the ground-state subspace to itself, but if M m happens to be a symmetry of H, then α M = 0 [76,104]. Though we are not aware of a general analytic derivation of Eq.(24), it was verified analytically and numerically in a large number of examples in Refs. [93,103,[105][106][107], for Hamiltonians in both chiral and non-chiral phases. Note the close analogy between Eq.(24) and the momentum polarization (3), where the microscopic Dehn-twist T m on the torus and the half translation T R on the cylinder play a similar role, and non-universal extensive contributions are followed by sub-extensive universal data. To make this analogy clearer, and make contact with the analysis of Sections III and VI, we consider the object Z T = Tr T m e −βH , which satisfies and can be interpreted as either the (unnormalized) thermal expectation value of T m , or the partition function on a space-time twisted by T, in analogy with Sec.II C. Equation (25) is valid for temperatures ∆E 1/β E g , much lower than the bulk gap E g and much higher than any finite size splitting in the ground state-subspace, ∆E = o A −1 .
Just like T R , the operator T m acts as a permutation of the lattice sites. Therefore, following Sections III and VI, if H is either locally stoquastic, or admits a locally signfree DQMC simulation, then Tr (T) ≥ 0. In terms of c and {θ a }, this implies e −2πic/24 a θ a = Tr (T) ≥ 0, where the sum runs over all topological spins.
The last statement applies to both bosonic and fermionic Hamiltonians.
For bosonic Hamiltonians, it can be strengthened by means of the Frobenius-Perron theorem. If H = U HU † is stoquastic in the on-site basis |s , Hermitian, and has a degenerate ground state subspace, then this subspace can be spanned by an orthonormal basis |i with positive entries in the on-site basis, s| i ≥ 0, see e.g Ref. [38]. This implies that where α T is generally different from α T , but the matrix T i j has the same spectrum as T ij in Eq. (24). This is a stronger form of (25), which implies T i j ≥ 0. Since T i j is also unitary, it is a permutation matrix, T i j = δ i ,σ(j ) for some σ ∈ S N , where N is the number of ground states. In turn, this implies that the spectrum of T is a disjoint union of complete sets of roots of unity, where R n k is the set of n k th roots of unity, n k , K ∈ N, and K k=1 n k = N . Therefore, Conjecture 1: A bosonic topological phase of matter where θ a e −2πic/24 is not a disjoint union of complete sets of roots of unity, admits no local Hamiltonians which are locally stoquastic.
In particular, this implies an intrinsic sign problem whenever 1 / ∈ θ a e −2πic/24 , thus generalizing Result 1. Moreover, the above statement applies non-trivially to phases with c ∈ 24Z. In particular, for non-chiral phases, where c = 0, it reduces to the result established in Ref. [38], thus generalizing it as well. The simplest example for a nonchiral phase with an intrinsic sign problem is the doubled semion phase, where {θ a } = {1, i, −i, 1} [37].
Though we are currently unaware of an analog of the Frobenius-Perron theorem that applies to DQMC, we expect that an analogous result can be established for fermionic Hamiltonians, Conjecture 1F: A topological phase of matter where θ a e −2πic/24 is not a complete set of roots of unity, admits no local fermion-boson Hamiltonians for which locally sign-free DQMC simulation is possible.
The above conjectures suggest a substantial improvement over the criterion e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }. To demonstrate this, we go back to the 1/q Laughlin phases and SU (2) k Chern-Simons theories considered in Table I. We find a conjectured intrinsic sign problem in all of the first one-thousand bosonic Laughlin phases (q even), fermionic Laughlin phases (q odd), and SU (2) k Chern-Simons theories. In particular, we note that the prototypical 1/3 Laughlin phase is not captured by the criterion e 2πic/24 / ∈ {θ a }, but is conjectured to be intrinsically sign-problematic.

VIII. DISCUSSION AND OUTLOOK
In this paper we established the existence of intrinsic sign problems in a broad class of chiral topological phases, namely those where e 2πic/24 does not happen to be the topological spin of an anyon. Since these intrinsic sign problems persist even when chirality, or time reversal symmetry breaking, appears spontaneously, they are rooted in the macroscopic and observable data c, {θ a }, rather than the microscopic absence (or presence) of time reversal symmetry.
Going beyond the simple setting of stoquastic Hamiltonians, we provided the first treatment of intrinsic sign problems in fermionic systems. In particular, we constructed a general framework which describes all DQMC algorithms and fermionic design principles that we are aware of, including the state of art design principles [18,[22][23][24] which are only beginning to be used by practitioners. Owing to its generality, it is likely that our framework will apply to additional design principles which have not yet been discovered, insofar as they are applied locally.
We also presented conjectures that strengthen our results, and unify them with those obtained in Refs. [9,38], under a single criterion in terms of c and {θ a }. These conjectures also imply intrinsic sign problems in many topological phases not covered by existing results.
Conceptually, our results and conjectures show that the sign problem is not only a statement of computational complexity: it is, in fact, intimately connected with the physically observable properties of quantum matter. Such a connection has long been heuristically appreciated by QMC practitioners, and is placed on a firm and quantitative footing by the discovery of intrinsic sign problems.
Despite the progress made here, our understanding of intrinsic sign problems is still in its infancy, and many open questions remain: Quantum computation and intrinsic sign problems: Intrinsic sign-problems relate the physics of topological phases to their computational complexity, in analogy with the classification of topological phases which enable universal quantum computation [48,49]. As we have seen, many phases of matter that are known to be universal for quantum computation are also intrinsically sign-problematic, supporting the paradigm of 'quantum advantage' or 'quantum supremacy' [50]. Determining whether intrinsic signproblems appear in all phases of matter which are universal for quantum computation is an interesting open problem.
Unconventional superconductivity and intrinsic sign problems: As described in the introduction, a major motivation for the study of intrinsic sign problems comes from long standing open problems in fermionic many-body systems, the nature of high temperature superconductivity in particular. It is currently believed that many high temperature superconductors, and the associated repulsive Hubbard models, are non chiral d-wave superconductors [17,27], in which we did not identify an intrinsic sign problem. This leaves open the optimistic possibility that the sign problem can in fact be cured in repulsive Hubbard models, though this has not yet been done in the relevant regime of parameters, away from half filling [26]. Nevertheless, the state of the art DMRG results of Ref. [27] do not exclude the possibility of a chiral d-wave superconductor ( = ±2 in Table I), in which we do find an intrinsic sign problem. There is also evidence for chiral d-wave superconductivity in doped graphene and related materials [108,109]. The study of intrinsic sign problems in the context of unconventional superconductivity is a promising direction for future work.
Non-locality as a possible route to sign-free QMC The intrinsic sign problems identified in this work add to existing evidence for the complexity of chiral topological phases -these do not admit local commuting projector Hamiltonians [54,[110][111][112], nor do they admit local Hamiltonians with a PEPS state as an exact ground state [43,[113][114][115].
Nevertheless, relaxing the locality requirement does lead to positive results for the simulation of chiral topological matter using commuting projectors or PEPS. First, commuting projector Hamiltonians can be obtained if the local bosonic or fermionic degrees of freedom are replaced by any-onic (and therefore non-local) excitations of an underlying chiral topological phase [116]. Second, chiral topological Hamiltonians can have a PEPS ground state if they include interactions (or hopping amplitudes) that slowly decay as a power-law with distance.
One may therefore hope that sign-free QMC simulations of chiral topological matter can also be performed if the locality requirements made in Sec.V are similarly relaxed. Do such 'weakly-local' sign-free models exist?
Easing intrinsic sign problems In this paper we proved the existence of an intrinsic sign problem in chiral topological phases of matter, but we did not quantify the severity of this sign problem, which is an important concept in both practical applications and theory of QMC. The severity of a sign problem is quantified by the smallness of the average sign sgn := p/ |p| of the QMC weights p with respect to the distribution |p|.
Since sgn can be viewed as the ratio of two partition functions, it obeys the generic scaling sgn ∼ e −∆βN , with ∆ ≥ 0, as βN → ∞ [2,10]. A sign problem exists when ∆ > 0, in which case QMC simulations require exponential computational resources, and this is what the intrinsic sign problem we identified implies for 'most' chiral topological phases of matter. From the point of view of computational complexity, all that matters is whether ∆ = 0 or ∆ > 0, but for practical applications the value of ∆ is very important, see e.g [108]. One may hope for a possible refinement of our results that provides a lower bound ∆ 0 > 0 for ∆, but since we have studied topological phases of matter, we view this as unlikely. It may therefore be possible to obtain finetuned models and QMC methods that lead to a ∆ small enough to be practically useful. More generally, it may be possible to search for such models algorithmically, thus easing the intrinsic sign problem [10].
Possible extensions: The chiral central charge only appears modulo 24 in our results. Nevertheless, the full value of c is physically meaningful, as reviewed in the introduction. Does an intrinsic sign problem exist in all phases with c = 0? The results of Ref. [39] strongly suggest this.
The arguments of Ref. [38] and Sec.VII apply equally well to any element of the modular group, rather than just the topological T-matrix, implying that the spectrum of all elements decomposes into full sets of roots of unity. This may imply a more restrictive constraint on the TFT data than conjectured in Sec.VII.
It is believed that all SPT phases can be characterized by universal complex phases acquired by their partition functions, when placed on certain non-trivial space-times [117][118][119][120][121], in analogy with Eq.(3). Loosely speaking, for an SPT with on-site symmetry group G, the relevant space-time would be obtained by purely geometric manipulations as performed in this paper, along with a twisting of boundary conditions by elements g ∈ G. Since each G acts on-site, we do not expect intrinsic sign problems whenever a non-trivial g is required to detect the SPT [122][123][124]. Nevertheless, it may be possible to obtain weaker statements, constraining the possible bases in which a Hamiltonian in a G-SPT may be stoquastic. Such constraints may be more useful for designing sign-free models than the stronger intrinsic sign problems discussed in this paper. Similar questions arise in the context of topologically ordered phases, enriched by an on-site symmetry.
Finally, going beyond gapped topological phases, are there intrinsically sign-problematic phases which are not gapped, not topological, or both? It is the authors' hope that answers to some of these questions will shed new light on the formidable quantum many-body problem. This appendix involves basic facts in CFT, which can be found in e.g [80,81].

Definition of h0 and ambiguities in its value
A chiral topological phase of matter has a finitedimensional ground state subspace on the spatial torus. A basis {|a } N a=1 for the torus ground state subspace exists, such that each state |a corresponds to a conformal family in the boundary CFT [40,41,104], constructed over a primary with right/left moving conformal weights h When the torus is cut to a cylinder with finite circumference L, the ground state degeneracy is lifted, generically leaving a unique ground state. The lowest energy eigenstates on the cylinder can also be labeled as {|a } N a=1 . Each |a corresponds to a non-universal choice of state in the conformal family labeled by h (l) a , h (r) a , which need not be the primary, as demonstrated explicitly in Appendix B below.
If the boundary is described by an idealized CFT, all |a s correspond to primaries, and the corresponding energies are given by E a = (4πv/L) (h + a − c + /24), relative to the ground state energy on the torus, where v is the velocity of the CFT and L is the circumference of the cylinder. These expressions receive exponentially small corrections of O Le −R/ξ and O Re −L/ξ , where ξ is the bulk correlation length and R is the length of the cylinder [76]. The cylinder ground state then corresponds to the CFT ground state, the primary with minimal h + a . More generally, each state |a corresponds to either a primary or a descendent, and has conformal weights h a , we then define h 0 := h a0 +n a0 , the chiral conformal weight associated with the cylinder ground state |a 0 . The value of h 0 therefore carries two ambiguities: a choice of conformal family a 0 ∈ {a}, and the choice of a state in the conformal family, n a0 ∈ N 0 . As described in Sec.II B, the only universal statement is θ 0 = e 2πih0 ∈ {θ a }, where θ a = e 2πiha are the topological spins of bulk anyons.
The result of Ref. [40] for the momentum polarization is given terms of the low lying cylinder eigenstates |a , where the lattice spacing is set to 1, N x = L. It follows that the thermal expectation valueZ/Z = Tr T R e −βH /Z is , if the temperature β −1 is much lower than the boundary energy differences ∼ N −1 x , namely β −1 = o N −1 x , as described in Sec.II.

The value of h0 in fermionic phases of matter
Fermionic topological phases are microscopically comprised of fermions (and possibly bosons), and have the fermion parity (−1) N f as a global symmetry [47,118,125,126]. It is therefore useful to probe such phases with a background Z 2 gauge field corresponding to (−1) N f , or a spin structure. For our purposes, this amounts to considering both periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions around non-contractible cycles in space-time.
In the main text we were only interested in locally signfree QMC representations of thermal partition functions, and sign-free geometric manipulations that can be performed to these. We therefore restricted attention to thermal boundary conditions in the imaginary time direction (see Sec.V A), and to periodic boundary conditions around the spatial cylinder. These boundary conditions cannot generically be modified without introducing signs into the QMC weights.
Here we provide a fuller picture by considering the behavior of h 0 with both periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions, in the closed x direction of the spatial cylinder. Since h 0 is a ground state property, the time direction is open and does not play a role.
For a fermionic chiral topological phase, the boundary CFT is also fermionic. The primary conformal weights {h a } then depend on the choice of boundary conditions (in the x direction), and as a result, so will the set of topological spins {θ a } in which θ 0 = e 2πih0 is valued. In particular, the vacuum spin θ I = 0 will not be included in {θ a } for periodic boundary conditions, while for anti-periodic boundary conditions, both the vacuum θ I = 1 and the spin θ ψ = −1 of the microscopic fermion will appear [41,80]. Note that θ ψ does not correspond to an emergent fermion, as in e.g the toric code [127], and therefore does not imply an additional ground state on the torus.
As an example, consider the series of Laughlin phases at filling 1/q , with q ∈ N, all of which have the chiral central charge c = 1. First, for q ∈ 2N the phase is bosonic, and we consider only periodic boundary conditions. The primary conformal weights are given by h a = a 2 /2q [36,128], with a ∈ N 0 . The topological spins θ a = e 2πiha depend only on a mod q, and the q spins {θ a } q−1 a=0 (appearing in Table I) correspond to the q degenerate ground states on the torus. In particular, the vacuum spin θ I = 1 is obtained for a = 0.
For q ∈ 2N − 1 the phase is fermionic, and we consider both periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions. For periodic boundary conditions the weights are given by h a = (a + 1/2) 2 /2q [36]. As in the bosonic case, θ a = e 2πiha depend only on a mod q, with {θ a } q−1 a=0 (appearing in Table  I) corresponding to the q degenerate ground states on the torus. Unlike the bosonic case, the vacuum spin θ I = 1 is not included in {θ a } q−1 a=0 . For anti-periodic boundary conditions, the weights are given by h a = a 2 /2q as in the bosonic case [128]. The set {θ a } q−1 a=0 again corresponds to the q torus ground states, but now θ ψ = θ a=q = −1 is an additional topological spin that corresponds to the physical Fermion ψ [66].
The simplest fermionic Laughlin phase is given by q = 1, and corresponds to a Chern insulator with Chern number ν = 1 [82,83], which is studied in detail in Appendix B below. The Chern insulator has a unique ground state on the torus, and accordingly, there is a unique topological spin θ σ = e 2πi(1/8) for periodic boundary conditions on the cylinder, and two topological spins θ I = 1, θ ψ = −1 for anti-periodic boundary conditions. Here ψ corresponds the physical fermions from which the Chern insulator is comprised. The object carrying the spin θ σ is the complex analog of the celebrated Majorana zero mode supported on vortices in the bulk of a p + ip superconductor [46,52].

Appendix B: Momentum polarization with non CFT boundaries
As reviewed in Sec.II, the existing analytic derivation of Eq.(3) relies on the CFT description of the physical boundaries of the cylinder, and of the line y = 0 where T R is discontinuous [40]. In this appendix we perform an analytic and numerical study that shows that, at least for free fermions, the relevant CFT expressions and the resulting Eq.(3), hold even if the boundary is not described by an idealized CFT. We will however, find a number of subtleties which have not been demonstrated in the literature, as already described below Eq.(2) and in Appendix A.

CFT finite-size correction in non CFT boundaries
The main ingredient in the analytic derivation of Eq. (3) is the expression (2) for the finite size correction to the momentum density in CFT [40]. In this appendix we show that, at least in the non-interacting case, Equation (2) remains valid, with θ 0 = e 2πih0 ∈ {θ a }, even when the boundary cannot be described by a CFT.
We will consider a Chern insulator, such as the prototypical Haldane model [82]. When the boundary degrees of freedom can be described by a CFT, they correspond to the Weyl fermion CFT, where c = ±1 and the primary conformal weights are h σ = ±1/8 (h I = 0, h ψ = ±1/2) for periodic (anti-periodic) boundary conditions, as described in Appendix A 2. The sign corresponds to the two possible chiralities. More generally, on a lattice with spacing 1, the boundary supports a complex fermion with an energy dispersion ε k , where k = k x takes values in the Brillouin zone R/2πZ for an infinite circumference L = ∞, or its discretization (2π/L) Z L ((2π/L) (Z L + 1/2)), for L < ∞ and periodic (anti-periodic) boundary conditions. The only requirement on ε k is that it be chiral, in the sense that it connects the two separated bulk energy bands. If the intersections k l and k u with the lower and upper bulk bands, respectively, satisfy k l < k u (k l > k u ), we say that the boundary is right (left) moving, or has a positive (negative) chirality, see Fig.7.
More generally, the dispersion will contain several dispersion branches {ε j,k } J j=1 , but since the momentum density is additive in j we restrict attention to a single branch. Without loss of generality, we also fix the chemical potential µ = 0, in which case the Fermi momentum k F satisfies ε k F = 0. The value of k F plays an important role is the subsequent analysis.
The simplest dispersion that satisfies the above requirements is the linear one ε k = v (k − k F ). For k F = 0 this corresponds to the Weyl fermion CFT. The presence of k F = 0 corresponds to the addition of a chemical potential vk F , which breaks the conformal symmetry. The generic form is 4 , and there may be several Fermi momenta if the dispersion is non monotonic, see Fig.7.
In all cases the many-body ground state momentum is given by summing the momenta of all filled single Fermion states p (L) = 1 L ε k <0 k, where the sum runs over k ∈ (2π/L) Z L such that ε k is negative and in the bulk energy gap. In order to obtain p as a continuous function of L, we treat the bulk energy gap as a smooth cutoff p (L) = 1 L ε k <0 kC (ε k ), where the function C (ε) goes to 1 (0) fast enough as ε goes to 0 (ε k l or ε ku ) 8 . The cutoff C represents the smooth delocalization of boundary eigenstates as their energy nears the bulk energy bands.
The case of a single non-zero Fermi momentum k F = 0 is more interesting, as it demonstrates that the integer part of h 0 can change as a function of L and k F . The direct derivation of the end result from the Euler-Maclaurin formula is surprisingly lengthy, so we omit it and present a more direct route to the end result. To be concrete, assume a positive chirality and k F > 0. The Euler-Maclaurin formula leads to cutoff independent results, so we can restrict attention to cutoff functions C (ε k ) which are identically 1 for 0 < k < k F . Since these can serve as cutoff functions for the case k F = 0 as well, we can deduce the k F = 0 momentum density p (L, k F ) from the k F = 0 momentum density p (L), where n = k F L/2π . Using Eq.(B2), we then have where p (∞) is the momentum density at L = ∞ and k F = 0. We see that the value of h 0 − c/24 is only equal to the idealized CFT result h σ − c/24 = 1/12 modulo 1, while the integer part jumps periodically as a function of k F at fixed number of sites L, or as the number of sites L at fixed k F . Treating k F as fixed and valued in (−π, π], the period in L is given by q = |2π/k F | ≥ 2, which need not be an integer. As described in Appendix A, the mod 1 ambiguity is attributed to h 0 rather than c, which corresponds to the topological spin θ 0 = θ σ = e 2πi(1/8) . The interpretation of Eq.(B4) is straight forward. As the number of sites L increases, the single particle momenta (2π/L) Z L become denser in the Brillouin zone R/2πZ. The nth jump in h 0 correspond to the motion of a single particle state with momentum 2πn/L through k F and into the Fermi sea, adding a momentum density 2πn/L 2 to the ground state. A subtle point, not mentioned above, is that when k F L/2π ∈ Z, which happens only when k F /2π = a/b is rational and L ∈ bN, a single particle state with momentum exactly k F exists, leading to an accidental degeneracy on the cylinder, between two many-body ground states with momentum densities given by Eq.(B4) with n and n + 1. The momentum polarization (3) then gives the average momentum density in the two ground-states, as visualized by the grey dotted line in Fig.8(a). For such system sizes the value θ 0 = −θ σ may be obtained rather than the generic θ 0 = θ σ .
The same analysis can be performed for anti-periodic boundary conditions, where we sum over single particle mo-20 menta k ∈ 2π L Z L + 1 2 . Equation (B4) is then modified to p (L, k F ) =p (∞) (B5) where n = k F L 2π − 1 2 . As a function of L, jumps in h 0 − c/24 occur with the same period q = |2π/k F | ≥ 2, but are shifted by q/2. Moreover, h 0 − c/24 now attains two values modulo 1, namely h I − c/24 = −1/24 and h ψ − c/24 = 1/2 − 1/24. Equation (B5) therefore demonstrates explicitly the statements made in Appendix A 1. For k F = 0, the cylinder ground state of the Chern insulator corresponds to the idealized Weyl fermion CFT. A single value h 0 = 0 is attained, which is the conformal weight h I of the CFT vacuum. A non-vanishing k F corresponds to the addition of a chemical potential to the CFT, which changes the energies of the CFT states, favoring a CFT exited state over the CFT vacuum. The cylinder ground state of the Chern insulator may then correspond to any CFT state in the conformal family of either the vacuum I or fermion ψ, which need not be primary. From the bulk TFT perspective, we see that θ 0 = e 2πih0 may be equal to either of the topological spins θ I = 1, θ ψ = −1 as a function of L.
As in the case of periodic boundary conditions, accidental degeneracies on the cylinder occur when k F L/2π ∈ Z + 1/2, changing the value of h 0 attained from the momentum polarization to its average over the degenerate states. For such system sizes, the value θ 0 = ± θ I θ ψ is obtained than the generic θ 0 ∈ {θ I , θ ψ }.
Equation (B5) is verified numerically in Fig.8(b), which demonstrates that the value of θ 0 = e 2πih0 , obtained from the momentum polarization (3), takes different values in the set {θ a } of topological spins as a function of system size L, apart from accidental degeneracies.

No finite-size correction at finite temperature
The line y = 0 where T R jumps can be interpreted as an additional boundary component at the 'entanglement temperature' β −1 * . Reference [40] used the modular transformations of CFT partition functions to demonstrate that when β * L/v, this boundary component does not contribute to the 1/L correction to logZ. Here, we note that the same result holds for free fermions with a general dispersion ε k . The contribution of the additional boundary component to logZ is given by logZ * (L) = Lf * (L), with the free energy density The complex number f * (∞) = log 1 + e iak e −β * ε k C (ε k ) dk/2π contributes to the nonuniversal α in Eq.(3).
Appendix C: Cutting the torus along an arbitrary vector For d = (d x , 0) we restrict to N x = n x d x , n ∈ N, viewing d x as an enlarged lattice spacing, and treating n as a reduced number of sites along the circumference in place of N x . The same logic applies to d = (0, d y ). For d = (d x , d y ) with both d x , d y = 0, we restrict to system sizes (N x , N y ) = nd, such that the line l = span R d is a diagonal of the rectangle nN x × nN y and corresponds to a circle on the torus (R/N x Z) × (R/N y Z). Cutting X along this line produces a cylinder C of circumference L = n |d|. We then view |d| as a lattice spacing and n as a the number of sites along the circumference. Note that the distance between the boundary components of the resulting cylinder is R = nd x d x / |d|, and the thermodynamic limit is indeed obtained as n → ∞. With these identifications the momentum polarization (3) remains unchanged, apart from a modification of the non-universal α to α |d| 2 .
Appendix D: Dealing with accidental degeneracies on the cylinder As demonstrated in Appendix B, for certain system sizes N x accidental degeneracies occur on the cylinder, and the function θ 0 (N x ) = e 2πih0(Nx) obtained from Eq.(3) may take values outside the set {θ a }, namely θ 0 = ± √ θ a θ b for a two-fold degeneracy. In this appendix we complete the derivation of Result 1 and 1F by considering the possibility of such degeneracies.
First, even in the presence of degeneracies, θ 0 is valued in a finite set. Therefore, Eq.(6) still implies that = n/m is rational, and that θ 0 (N x ) e −2πic/24 = e −2πi N 2 x periodically covers a subset S 1 of mth roots of unity, for all large enough N x . We denote by N ⊂ N the set of circumferences N x for which a degeneracy appears and θ 0 (N x ) / ∈ {θ a }. If circumferences N x ∈ mN, where e 2πi N 2 x = 1, are not all contained in N , then 1 = θ 0 (N x ) e −2πic/24 ∈ θ a e −2πic/24 , as stated in Results 1 and 1F. We are left with the complementary case, where degeneracies occur for all N x ∈ mN, i.e mN ⊂ N . Note that this case is highly fine tuned, as it ties together the nonuniversal = n/m and the set N of N x s where accidental degeneracies appear. In order to deal with this case, we make use of the Frobenius-Perron theorem to resolve the degenerate ground-state subspace, without introducing signs. The analysis applies only to the bosonic setting of Result 1, and is similar to that made in Sec.VII. We now have a Hamiltonian H on the cylinder, which has an exactly degenerate ground-state subspace for all N x ∈ mN, and has non-positive matrix elements in the on-site homogenous basis |s . The Frobenius-Perron theorem implies that an orthonormal basis |i with non-negative entries may be chosen for the ground state subspace, s| i ≥ 0 for all s, i. It follows that the matrix elements of T R in the basis |i are non-negative, M ij := i| T R |j ≥ 0. Taking the N x th matrix power of M we have M Nx ij ≥ 0. Equation (3) implies that the eigenvalues of M Nx are of the form e −δ N 2 x e −2πi N 2 x +o(1) θ a e −2πic/24 , so we can write M Nx ij = e −δ N 2 x e −2πi N 2 x +o(1) T ij , where T ij has eigenvalues {λ} ⊂ θ a e −2πic/24 . In particular, T ij is unitary. Since e 2πi N 2 x = 1 for all N x ∈ mN, we see that T ij also has non-negative entires, and is therefore a permutation matrix, containing 1 in its spectrum (see Sec.VII). It follows that 1 ∈ {λ} ⊂ θ a e −2πic/24 , asserting Result 1.
We are currently unaware of an analog of the Frobenius-Perron theorem in the context of DQMC, that may be used to resolve the degenerate ground-state subspace without introducing signs. Instead, we will make a physical assumption under which Result 1F holds. Namely, we will assume that the fine tuned constraint = n/m and mN ⊂ N may be lifted by a sign-free perturbation. This includes (i) perturbations to the effective single-fermion Hamiltonian h φ(τ ) that do not violate the algebraic condition h φ(τ ) ∈ C h , (ii) perturbations to the bosonic action S φ that maintain its reality, and (iii) changes of the vector d along which the torus is cut to a cylinder, as described in Appendix C, which will generically change the details of the boundary spectrum, including the non-universal number and the set N of N x s where accidental degeneracies appear. A robustness of and the set N , both non-universal, under all three of the above deformations certainly goes beyond the low energy description of a chiral TFT in the bulk and a chiral CFT on the boundary. We also adopt this assumption in the fermionic spontaneously-chiral setting of Result 2F.
A stoquastic variant of the above assumption may also be adopted to establish the bosonic spontaneously-chiral Result 2, but a stronger statement can in fact be made, by again making use of the Frobenius-Perron theorem to resolve the accidentally degenerate ground states. The Frobenius-Perron theorem does not immediately complete the derivation of Result 2, since the former is a ground state statement, while the latter made use of the finite temperature ∆E β −1 N −1 x , where ∆E is the exponentially small finite-size splitting between low lying symmetry breaking eigenstates. This difficulty does not arise in the 'classical symmetry breaking' scenario, where ∆E = 0. In the generic case ∆E = 0, we can make progress under the assumption that the T , P-even state W [|+ + |− ] has lower energy than the T , P-odd state W [|+ − |− ], rather than the opposite possibility. The derivation of Result 2 in Sec.IV A can then be repeated at zero temperature. In particular, Eq.(10) and its analysis are unchanged.