Charged-particle Multiplicity Density at Midrapidity in Central Pb-pb Collisions at Root S(nn)=2.76 Tev 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 Vzero Amplitude (charge Arb. Units) Data Glauber Mc 0%-5% Centrality

The first measurement of the charged-particle multiplicity density at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV is presented. For an event sample corresponding to the most central 5% of the hadronic cross section, the pseudorapidity density of primary charged particles at midrapidity is 1584 AE 4ðstatÞ AE 76ðsystÞ, which corresponds to 8:3 AE 0:4ðsystÞ per participating nucleon pair. This represents an increase of about a factor 1.9 relative to pp collisions at similar collision energies, and about a factor 2.2 to central Au-Au collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 0:2 TeV. This measurement provides the first experimental constraint for models of nucleus-nucleus collisions at LHC energies. The theory of strong interactions, quantum chromody-namics (QCD), predicts a phase transition at high temperature between hadronic matter, where quarks and gluons are confined inside hadrons, and a deconfined state of matter, the quark-gluon plasma. A new frontier in the study of QCD matter opened with the first collisions of 208 Pb ions in November 2010, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. These collisions are expected to generate matter at unprecedented temperatures and energy densities in the laboratory. The first step in characterizing the system produced in these collisions is the measurement of the charged-particle pseudorapidity density, which constrains the dominant particle production mechanisms and is essential to estimate the initial energy density. The dependence of the charged-particle multiplicity density on energy and system size reflects the interplay between hard parton-parton scattering processes and soft processes. Predictions of models that successfully describe particle production at RHIC vary by a factor of 2 at the LHC [1,2]. This Letter reports the measurement of the charged-particle pseudorapidity density produced in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC, utilizing data taken with the ALICE detector [3] at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV. The primary charged-particle density, dN ch =d, in central (small impact parameter) Pb-Pb collisions is measured in the pseudorapidity interval jj jÀln tanð=2Þj < 0:5, where is the polar angle between the charged-particle direction and the beam axis (z). We define primary particles as prompt particles produced in the collision, including decay products, except those from weak decays of strange particles. The present measurement extends the study of particle densities in nucleus-nucleus collisions into the TeV regime. We make comparisons to model predictions [4–16] and …

The theory of strong interactions, quantum chromodynamics (QCD), predicts a phase transition at high temperature between hadronic matter, where quarks and gluons are confined inside hadrons, and a deconfined state of matter, the quark-gluon plasma.A new frontier in the study of QCD matter opened with the first collisions of 208 Pb ions in November 2010, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN.These collisions are expected to generate matter at unprecedented temperatures and energy densities in the laboratory.
The first step in characterizing the system produced in these collisions is the measurement of the charged-particle pseudorapidity density, which constrains the dominant particle production mechanisms and is essential to estimate the initial energy density.The dependence of the chargedparticle multiplicity density on energy and system size reflects the interplay between hard parton-parton scattering processes and soft processes.Predictions of models that successfully describe particle production at RHIC vary by a factor of 2 at the LHC [1,2].
This Letter reports the measurement of the chargedparticle pseudorapidity density produced in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC, utilizing data taken with the ALICE detector [3] at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV.The primary charged-particle density, dN ch =d, in central (small impact parameter) Pb-Pb collisions is measured in the pseudorapidity interval jj jÀln tanð=2Þj < 0:5, where is the polar angle between the charged-particle direction and the beam axis (z).We define primary particles as prompt particles produced in the collision, including decay products, except those from weak decays of strange particles.
A detailed description of the ALICE experiment is given in Ref. [3].Here, we briefly describe the detector components used in this analysis.The silicon pixel detector (SPD) is the innermost part of the inner tracking system.It consists of two cylindrical layers of hybrid silicon pixel assemblies positioned at radial distances of 3.9 and 7.6 cm from the beam line, with a total of 9:8 Â 10 6 pixels of size 50 Â 425 m 2 , read out by 1200 electronic chips.The SPD coverage for particles originating from the center of the detector is jj < 2:0 and jj < 1:4 for the inner and outer layers, respectively.Each chip provides a fast signal if at least one of its pixels is hit.The signals from the 1200 chips are combined in a programmable logic unit which supplies a trigger signal.The fraction of SPD channels active during data taking was 70% for the inner and 78% for the outer layer.The VZERO detector consists of two arrays of 32 scintillator tiles placed at distances z ¼ 3:3 m and z ¼ À0:9 m from the nominal interaction point, covering the full azimuth within 2:8 < < 5:1 (VZERO-A) and À3:7 < < À1:7 (VZERO-C).Both the amplitude and the time signal in each scintillator are recorded.The VZERO time resolution is better than 1 ns, allowing discrimination of beam-beam collisions from background events produced upstream of the experiment.The VZERO also provides a trigger signal.The zero degree calorimeters (ZDCs) measure the energy of spectators (noninteracting nucleons) in two identical detectors, located AE114 m from the interaction point.Each ZDC consists of two quartz fiber sampling calorimeters: a neutron calorimeter positioned between the two beam pipes downstream of the first machine dipole that separates the two charged-particle beams and a proton calorimeter positioned externally to the outgoing beam pipe.The energy resolution at beam energy is estimated to be 11% for the neutron and 13% for the proton calorimeter, respectively.
For the data analyzed, beams of four bunches, with about 10 7 Pb ions per bunch, collided at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV, with an estimated luminosity of 5 Â 10 23 cm À2 s À1 .The trigger was configured for high efficiency for hadronic events, requiring at least two out of the following three conditions: (i) two pixel chips hit in the outer layer of the SPD, (ii) a signal in VZERO-A, (iii) a signal in VZERO-C.The threshold in the VZERO detector corresponds approximately to the energy deposition of a minimum ionizing particle.The luminous region had a rms width of 5.9 cm in the longitudinal direction and 50 m in the transverse direction.The estimated luminosity corresponds to a hadronic collision rate of about 4 Hz.The observed rate was about 50 Hz, mainly due to electromagnetically induced processes [33].These processes have very large cross sections at LHC energies but generate very low multiplicities and therefore do not contribute to the high particle multiplicities of interest for the present analysis.The trigger rate without beam was negligible and the rate in coincidence with bunches of only one beam was about 1 Hz.This beam background is eliminated from the triggered event sample using the VZERO timing information, as well as the correlation between the number of tracks reconstructed in the time projection chamber and the number of hits in the SPD.
Off-line event characterization utilizes global event observables that are intrinsically correlated over different regions of phase space through the initial collision geometry.Figure 1 (upper) shows the measured correlation between the energy deposited in the ZDC and the sum of amplitudes in the VZERO detector.The VZERO response is proportional to the event multiplicity, and the ZDC energy to the number of noninteracting nucleons close to beam rapidity.As events become more central, with smaller impact parameter, they generate larger multiplicity in VZERO and less energy forward in the ZDC.This behavior is understood based on collision geometry and nuclear breakup [34].For small ZDC response the VZERO signal has two distinct values corresponding to peripheral and central collisions.However, the VZERO signal alone can be used to discriminate on centrality.Figure 1 (lower) shows the distribution of the VZERO amplitude for all triggered events after beam background removal.The distribution is fit using the Glauber model [35] to describe the collision geometry and a negative binomial distribution to describe particle production [34].In addition to the two parameters of the negative binomial distribution, there is one free parameter that controls the power-law dependence of particle production on the number of participating nucleons (N part ).To avoid the region contaminated by electromagnetic processes, which constitutes over 90% of the triggered events, the fit is restricted to the VZERO amplitude region above 150, where the trigger for hadronic collisions is fully efficient.The fraction of the hadronic cross section from the model fit corresponding to this cut, 87%, allows the determination of the cross section percentile for any more-central VZERO cut by integrating the measured distribution.The most central 5% fraction of the hadronic cross section was determined in this way.
The analysis is based on the VZERO event selection as described above.Among the triggered sample of about 650 000 events, 3615 events correspond to the most central 5% of the hadronic cross section, indicated by the shaded region in Fig. 1 (lower).The first step in the measurement of the charged-particle multiplicity is the determination of the primary vertex position by correlating hits in the two SPD layers.All events in the central sample are found to have a well-constrained primary vertex.To minimize edge effects at the limit of the SPD acceptance we have only used events with reconstructed vertex at jz vtx j < 7 cm, reducing the sample to 2711 events.Tracklet candidates [25] are formed using information on the position of the primary vertex and of hits on the SPD layers.A tracklet is defined by a pair of hits, one on each SPD layer.Using the reconstructed vertex as the origin, we calculate the differences in azimuthal (Á', bending plane) and polar (Á, nonbending direction) angles for pairs of hits [31].Only hit combinations satisfying a selection on the sum of the squares of Á' and Á, each normalized to its estimated resolution (60 mrad in Á' and 25sin 2 mrad in Á), are selected as tracklets.If multiple tracklet candidates share a hit, only the combination with the smallest sum of squares of Á' and Á is kept.The cut imposed on Á' efficiently selects charged particles with transverse momentum (p t ) above 50 MeV=c.Particles below 50 MeV=c are mostly absorbed by material.
The charged-particle pseudorapidity density dN ch =d is obtained from the number of tracklets within jj < 0:5 according to dN ch =d ¼ Â ð1 À ÞdN tracklets =d, where is the correction factor for the acceptance and efficiency for a primary track to generate a tracklet and is the probability to form a background tracklet from uncorrelated hits.The corrections and are determined as a function of the z position of the primary vertex and the pseudorapidity of the tracklet.The simulations used to calculate the corrections are based on the HIJING [36] event generator and a GEANT3 [37] model of the detector response.Three different methods have been used to estimate the combinatorial background.
The main method to estimate the combinatorial background relies on the event simulation using a sample of events with similar multiplicities (SPD hits) as in the real data.In Fig. 2 the Á' distribution for candidate tracklets is compared for data and simulation.The distributions are very similar, practically identical in the background dominated tails.The second method is based on the injection of random background hits in the real event, in order to evaluate the probability of creating fake tracklets by combinatorics.In the third method events are modified by rotating hits in the inner SPD layer by 180 in ', thereby destroying real correlations, but preserving global event features.In all cases, the absolute amount of combinatorial background is obtained by matching the tracklet and background distributions in the tails.For the main method, which ideally provides both the shape and the normalization, an adjustment of 1% is needed to match the tails.The estimated combinatorial background is about 14%.In order to account for the effect of the correlated background, the same background subtraction procedure is also applied to the simulation (i.e., without relying on the event generator information).The correction for the acceptance and efficiency, , is obtained by the ratio of the number of generated primary charged particles to the number of reconstructed tracklets after subtraction of the combinatorial background.In this way, accounts for geometrical acceptance, detector and reconstruction efficiencies, contamination by weak decay products of strange particles, conversions, secondary interactions, and undetected particles below 50 MeV=c transverse momentum.The overall correction factor varies slightly depending on vertex position and , and is about 2.
We have considered the following sources of systematic uncertainties: background subtraction estimated as 2% by comparing the results of different methods; particle composition estimated as 1% by changing the relative abundances of protons, pions, kaons by a factor of 2; contamination by weak decays estimated as 1% by changing the relative contribution of the yield of strange particles by a factor of 2; low-p t extrapolation estimated as 2% by varying the amount of undetected particles at low p t by a factor of 2; event generator estimated as 2% by using HIJING [36] with and without jet quenching, as well as DPMJET [38] for the corrections; centrality definition estimated as 3% by using an alternative event selection based on the SPD hit multiplicities, and by varying the range of the Glauber model fit.All other sources of systematic errors considered (tracklet cuts, vertex cuts, material budget, detector efficiency, background events) were found to be negligible.The total systematic errors amounts to 4.8%.Independent cross-checks performed using tracks reconstructed in the time projection chamber and the inner tracking system yield results consistent within the systematic uncertainty.
In order to compare bulk particle production in different collision systems and at different energies, and to compare with model calculations, the charged-particle density is scaled by the number of participating nucleons, determined using the Glauber model fit described above (Fig. 1).The average number of participants for the 5% most central events is found to be hN part i ¼ 381 with a rms of 18 and a systematic uncertainty of 1%.The systematic uncertainty was obtained by varying the parameters of the Glauber calculation within the experimental uncertainty and by AE8% around 64 mb for the nucleon-nucleon cross section, by using different fit ranges, and by comparing results obtained for different centrality variables (SPD hits or combined use of the ZDC and VZERO signals).We measure a density of primary charged particles at midrapidity dN ch =d ¼ 1584 AE 4ðstatÞ AE 76ðsystÞ.Normalizing per participant pair, we obtain dN ch =d= ð0:5hN part iÞ ¼ 8:3 AE 0:4ðsystÞ with negligible statistical error.In Fig. 3, this value is compared to the measurements for Au-Au and Pb-Pb, and nonsingle diffractive pp and p " p collisions over a wide range of collision energies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].It is interesting to note that the energy dependence is steeper for heavy-ion collisions than for pp and p " p collisions.For illustration, the curves / s 0:15 NN and / s 0:11 NN are shown superimposed on the data.A significant increase, by a factor 2.2, in the pseudorapidity density is observed at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV for Pb-Pb compared to ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 0:2 TeV for Au-Au.The average multiplicity per participant pair for our centrality selection is found to be a factor 1.9 higher than that for pp and p " p collisions at similar energies.
Figure 4 compares the measured pseudorapidity density to model calculations that describe RHIC measurements at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 0:2 TeV, and for which predictions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV are available.Empirical extrapolation from lower energy data [4] significantly underpredicts the measurement.Perturbative-QCD-inspired Monte Carlo event generators, based on the HIJING model tuned to 7 TeV pp data without jet quenching [5], on the dual parton model [6], or on the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model [7], are consistent with the measurement.Models based on initial-state gluon density saturation have a range of predictions depending on the specific implementation [8][9][10][11][12] and exhibit a varying level of agreement with the measurement.The prediction of a hybrid model based on hydrodynamics and saturation of final-state phase space of scattered partons [13] is close to the measurement.A hydrodynamic model in which multiplicity is scaled from p þ p collisions overpredicts the measurement [14], while a model incorporating scaling based on Landau hydrodynamics underpredicts the measurement [15].Finally, a calculation based on modified PYTHIA and hadronic rescattering [16] underpredicts the measurement.
In summary, we have measured the charged-particle pseudorapidity density at midrapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi s NN p ¼ 2:76 TeV, for the most central 5% fraction of the hadronic cross section.We find dN ch =d ¼ 1584 AE 4ðstatÞ AE 76ðsystÞ, corresponding to 8:3 AE 0:4ðsystÞ per participant pair.These values are significantly larger than those measured at RHIC, and indicate a stronger energy dependence than measured in pp collisions.The result presented in this Letter provides an essential constraint for models describing high energy nucleus-nucleus collisions.
The ALICE Collaboration would like to thank all its engineers and technicians for their invaluable contributions to the construction of the experiment and the CERN accelerator teams for the outstanding performance of the LHC complex.The ALICE Collaboration acknowledges the following funding agencies for their support in building and running the ALICE detector: Calouste Gulbenkian

FIG. 1 (
FIG.1(color online).Upper panel: Correlation of ZDC and the VZERO response in hadronic collisions.Lower panel: Distribution of the sum of amplitudes in the VZERO scintillator tiles (black histogram); inset shows the low amplitude part of the distribution.The gray (red) line shows the fit of the Glauber calculation to the measurement.The fit was performed above the cut indicated in the inset, avoiding the region at low amplitudes dominated by the electromagnetic processes.The shaded area corresponds to the most central 5% of hadronic collisions.

FIG. 2 (
FIG. 2 (color online).Distribution of the azimuthal separation (Á') of all candidate tracklets in data, simulation, and the background contribution that is estimated from the simulation.