• Open Access

What do seniors remember from freshman physics?

Andrew Pawl, Analia Barrantes, David E. Pritchard, and Rudolph Mitchell
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 020118 – Published 10 December 2012

Abstract

We have given a group of 56 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) seniors who took mechanics as freshmen a written test similar to the final exam they took in their freshman course as well as the Mechanics Baseline Test (MBT) and the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS). Students in majors unrelated to physics scored 60% lower on the written analytic part of the final than they would have as freshmen. The mean score of all participants on the MBT was insignificantly changed from their average on the posttest they took as freshmen. However, the students’ performance on 9 of the 26 MBT items (with 6 of the 9 involving graphical kinematics) represents a gain over their freshman posttest score (a normalized gain of about 70%), while their performance on the remaining 17 questions is best characterized as a loss of approximately 50% of the material learned in the freshman course. On multiple-choice questions covering advanced physics concepts, the mean score of the participants was about 50% lower than the average performance of freshmen. Although attitudinal survey results indicate that almost half the seniors feel the specific mechanics course content is unlikely to be useful to them, a significant majority (75%–85%) feel that physics does teach valuable problem solving skills, and an overwhelming majority believe that mechanics should remain a required course at MIT.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 24 August 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020118

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Andrew Pawl*, Analia Barrantes, and David E. Pritchard

  • Physics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

Rudolph Mitchell

  • Teaching and Learning Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *Now at: Department of Chemistry and Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Platteville, Platteville, Wisconsin, USA. pawla@uwplatt.edu

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 8, Iss. 2 — July - December 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×