• Open Access

Comparing retrieval-based practice and peer instruction in physics learning

Tianlong Zu, Jeremy Munsell, and N. Sanjay Rebello
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010105 – Published 10 January 2019

Abstract

Even though it has been shown that retrieval practice could foster deeper learning and better long-term retention in other domains such as psychology, it is rarely studied in the context of physics learning where students need to solve more complicated problems. To an even lesser degree is comparing retrieval-based learning with other active learning style methods adopted in the physics classroom. In this study, we compared the effects of retrieval-based learning and peer instruction based restudying on physics problem solving and transfer. In both conditions (retrieval and peer instruction), participants were first presented video lectures explaining the definition of speed and energy conservation. In the training session that immediately followed the video lectures, the retrieval condition was asked to recognize, recall, and apply the relevant physics concepts to solving problems; while the peer instruction condition was asked to discuss the two video lectures with each other in a group of three or four members. After this training, an immediate and a delayed (one-week) final test were administered. Both tests contained an initial task, isomorphic to the training materials, near transfer tasks, and far transfer tasks for each topic. Subjective judgment of learning (JOL) was collected immediately after watching the video lectures, after the training, and right before the delayed final test. We found a retention advantage of the retrieval practice for the initial tasks, but not for the near and far transfer tasks. We also found an advantage of the retrieval practice on far transfer on the immediate final test. Peer instruction training inflated the participants’ JOL compared to the retrieval practice. Both JOL scores were significantly lower than after the video lecture but did not differ from before the delayed final test.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 20 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010105

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Physics Education Research

Authors & Affiliations

Tianlong Zu1,*, Jeremy Munsell1, and N. Sanjay Rebello1,2

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, 525 Northwestern Ave., West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 2Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Purdue University, 100 N. University St., West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

  • *Corresponding author. tzu@purdue.edu

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 15, Iss. 1 — January - June 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×