• Open Access

Investigating undergraduate students’ ideas about the fate of the Universe

Mallory Conlon, Kim Coble, Janelle M. Bailey, and Lynn R. Cominsky
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020128 – Published 10 November 2017

Abstract

As astronomers further develop an understanding of the fate of the Universe, it is essential to study students’ ideas on the fate of the Universe so that instructors can communicate the field’s current status more effectively. In this study, we examine undergraduate students’ preinstruction ideas of the fate of the Universe in ten semester-long introductory astronomy course sections (ASTRO 101) at three institutions. We also examine students’ postinstruction ideas about the fate of the Universe in ASTRO 101 over five semester-long course sections at one institution. The data include precourse surveys given during the first week of instruction (N=264), postinstruction exam questions (N=59), and interviews. We find that, preinstruction, more than a quarter of ASTRO 101 students either do not respond or respond with “I don’t know” when asked what the long-term fate of the Universe is. We also find that, though the term was not necessarily used, students tend to describe a “big chill” scenario in the preinstruction surveys, among a wide variety of other scenarios. A fraction of students describe the fate of smaller-scale systems, possibly due to confusion of the hierarchical nature of structure in the Universe. Preinstruction, students mention the Universe’s expansion when describing how astronomers know the fate of the Universe but do not discuss how we know the Universe is expanding or the relationship between expansion and the fate of the Universe. Postinstruction, students’ responses shift toward greater degrees of completeness and correctness.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 6 May 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020128

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
  1. Professional Topics
Physics Education Research

Authors & Affiliations

Mallory Conlon

  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

Kim Coble*

  • San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132, USA

Janelle M. Bailey

  • Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA

Lynn R. Cominsky

  • Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California 94928, USA

  • *Corresponding author. kcoble@sfsu.edu

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 13, Iss. 2 — July - December 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Physics Education Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×