Abstract
A Reply to the Comment by Pawel Keblinski and David G. Cahill.
- Received 7 February 2005
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.209402
©2005 American Physical Society
A Reply to the Comment by Pawel Keblinski and David G. Cahill.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.209402
©2005 American Physical Society