Abstract
A Reply to the Comment by Benoît Champagne and Bernard Kirtman.
- Received 6 April 2005
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.109402
©2005 American Physical Society
A Reply to the Comment by Benoît Champagne and Bernard Kirtman.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.109402
©2005 American Physical Society