Efficient and Low-Backaction Quantum Measurement Using a Chip-Scale Detector

Eric I. Rosenthal, Christian M. F. Schneider, Maxime Malnou, Ziyi Zhao, Felix Leditzky, Benjamin J. Chapman, Waltraut Wustmann, Xizheng Ma, Daniel A. Palken, Maximilian F. Zanner, Leila R. Vale, Gene C. Hilton, Jiansong Gao, Graeme Smith, Gerhard Kirchmair, and K. W. Lehnert
Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 090503 – Published 3 March 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Superconducting qubits are a leading platform for scalable quantum computing and quantum error correction. One feature of this platform is the ability to perform projective measurements orders of magnitude more quickly than qubit decoherence times. Such measurements are enabled by the use of quantum-limited parametric amplifiers in conjunction with ferrite circulators—magnetic devices which provide isolation from noise and decoherence due to amplifier backaction. Because these nonreciprocal elements have limited performance and are not easily integrated on chip, it has been a long-standing goal to replace them with a scalable alternative. Here, we demonstrate a solution to this problem by using a superconducting switch to control the coupling between a qubit and amplifier. Doing so, we measure a transmon qubit using a single, chip-scale device to provide both parametric amplification and isolation from the bulk of amplifier backaction. This measurement is also fast, high fidelity, and has 70% efficiency, comparable to the best that has been reported in any superconducting qubit measurement. As such, this work constitutes a high-quality platform for the scalable measurement of superconducting qubits.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 August 2020
  • Accepted 21 January 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.090503

© 2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Eric I. Rosenthal1,2,3,*, Christian M. F. Schneider4,5, Maxime Malnou2,3, Ziyi Zhao1,2,3, Felix Leditzky6,1,3,7, Benjamin J. Chapman8, Waltraut Wustmann9, Xizheng Ma1,2,3, Daniel A. Palken1,2,3, Maximilian F. Zanner4,5, Leila R. Vale3, Gene C. Hilton3, Jiansong Gao2,3, Graeme Smith1,2,3,7, Gerhard Kirchmair4,5, and K. W. Lehnert1,2,3

  • 1JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 3National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
  • 4Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • 5Institute for Experimental Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • 6Department of Mathematics & Illinois Quantum Information Science and Technology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 7Center for Theory of Quantum Matter, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
  • 8Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • 9The Laboratory for Physical Sciences, College Park, Maryland 20740, USA

  • *eric.rosenthal@colorado.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 126, Iss. 9 — 5 March 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×