Relative role of short interfacial fingers and long internally driven streamers in convective flows below growing sea ice

C. A. Middleton, S. S. Gopalakrishnan, I. Berenstein, B. Knaepen, J.-L. Tison, and A. De Wit
Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 043503 – Published 25 April 2022

Abstract

Convective dynamics developing below growing sea ice are studied experimentally by freezing salt water from above in a quasi-two-dimensional Hele-Shaw cell. Observations of the convective processes are made with Schlieren and direct imaging systems, allowing visualization both under and within the growing ice. Buoyancy-driven flows are seen to develop under the ice layer via two different mechanisms: On one hand, brine diffuses out from the ice layer creating a denser boundary layer of enhanced salinity, which triggers boundary layer convection resulting in small-scale interfacial fingers. On the other hand, internal flow within brine drainage channels inside the ice is observed flushing out longer-scale convective streamers at given locations at the ice-water interface. Streamers descend in the bulk aqueous layer faster and for longer distances than fingers. Simulations confirm that, despite nonlinear interactions between fingers and streamers, the different speeds observed can be correlated to different density differences between the interfacial or internal rejection and the underlying bulk salt water. Estimates of relative mass fluxes through the interface by the two mechanisms suggest that, when streamers are active, the mass of salt rejected through the streamer pathway can be larger than the one expelled through the finger pathway. However, as fingers are maintained throughout the ice growth while the rejection from brine channels features an intermittent “on-off” behavior, there are certain periods of time when the mass flux of the two mechanisms is similar, but also some time intervals during which the flux due to interfacial short fingers becomes dominant.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 2 May 2020
  • Accepted 24 March 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.7.043503

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

C. A. Middleton1,2,3, S. S. Gopalakrishnan1,4, I. Berenstein1, B. Knaepen4, J.-L. Tison2, and A. De Wit1

  • 1Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Nonlinear Physical Chemistry Unit, CP231, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • 2Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Laboratoire de glaciologie, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • 3School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GH, United Kingdom
  • 4Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Service de physique statistique et plasmas, CP231, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 7, Iss. 4 — April 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×