Structure functions in nocturnal atmospheric boundary layer turbulence

Eliezer Kit, Eli Barami, and H. J. S. Fernando
Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 084605 – Published 17 August 2021

Abstract

This paper analyzes odd and even higher-order moments for longitudinal velocity increment Δu(x,r), where x is the longitudinal coordinate and r is the separation distance, based on the canonical and a modified normalization for skewness of longitudinal velocity derivative u/x. Two types of data were used, stably stratified turbulence data from the nocturnal atmospheric boundary layer taken during the Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations field campaign and from the direct numerical simulation of homogeneous and isotropic turbulence in a box at four Reynolds numbers and four different grid resolutions. Third moment data normalized by the same moment of third order for modulus |Δu(x,r)| representing modified skewness of the velocity increment showed a better collapse at all Reynolds numbers in the inertial and viscous subranges than canonical normalized skewness with normalization parameter (Δu(x,r))23/2, where ·· represents the ensemble average. The analysis also considered odd pth-order classical structure functions Δu(x,r)p with Kolmogorov-theory based normalization Δu(x,r)p/(ɛr)p/3 for the inertial subrange, where ε is the rate of dissipation, and a modulus-based structure function |Δu(x,r)|p/(ɛr)p/3. Both types of structure functions of order p=1ndash;6 were computed using different normalizations, and corresponding scaling exponents were assessed for the inertial and viscous subranges. Scaling for modulus-based structure functions in the viscous subrange was identified as |Δu(x,r)|prp·(5/6). In the viscous subrange, the velocity increment varied linearly with r for the classical third moment Δu(x,r)3r3 based on the velocity increment while the classical fifth moment Δu(x,r)5 did not provide any meaningful scaling exponent. A plausible qualitative explanation linking these effects to anisotropy of nocturnal stratified turbulence is proposed.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 16 December 2020
  • Accepted 14 July 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.084605

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Eliezer Kit1,2,*, Eli Barami3,4, and H. J. S. Fernando2,5

  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46530, USA
  • 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
  • 4Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Yavne 8180000, Israel
  • 5Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46530, USA

  • *Corresponding author: elikit@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 6, Iss. 8 — August 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×