Self-sustained instability, transition, and turbulence induced by a long separation bubble in the footprint of an internal solitary wave. I. Flow topology

Takahiro Sakai, Peter J. Diamessis, and Gustaaf B. Jacobs
Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 103801 – Published 28 October 2020

Abstract

The development of a separated bottom boundary layer in the footprint of a large-amplitude internal solitary wave of depression, propagating against an oncoming barotropic current, is examined in detail using high-resolution implicit large eddy simulation. The wave is supported by a continuous two-layer stratification. The Reynolds number based on the water column height is 1.6×105. This numerical simulation is the first to reproduce the self-sustained three-dimensional vortex shedding, resultant transition, and turbulence under an ISW, which have long been hypothesized to occur in field experiments. No artificial noise is inserted into the flow domain. Part I of this study focuses on a structural description of the sequence of flow regimes developing from a wave-induced, long, high-aspect-ratio, laminar separation bubble. Three illuminating topological features are identified. (a) The spatial development of the self-sustained turbulence is composed of three transitional stages: (i) spontaneous excitation of a global instability in the separation bubble that emanates trailing vortices, (ii) vortex breakup and degeneration into turbulent clouds, and (iii) relaxation to a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer. (b) In the separation bubble, there exists a three-dimensional linear global oscillator, which is primarily excited by the two-dimensional absolute instability of the separated shear layer. This global mode possesses a transverse coherent structure. The transverse perturbation subsequently excites an elliptic instability mode inside the shed vortex, resulting in an axial distortion of the vortex core. (c) A shortwave secondary instability is excited in the form of a series of coherent streamwise vortex streaks that wrap around each shed vortex, leading to rapid break up and burst of the vortex.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 22 January 2020
  • Accepted 11 June 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.103801

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

Takahiro Sakai*

  • Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-1191, USA

Peter J. Diamessis

  • School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

Gustaaf B. Jacobs

  • Department of Aerospace Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, USA

  • *tsakai@usc.edu

See Also

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 5, Iss. 10 — October 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×