Analyte preconcentration in nanofluidic channels with nonuniform zeta potential

A. Eden, C. McCallum, B. D. Storey, S. Pennathur, and C. D. Meinhart
Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 124203 – Published 21 December 2017
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

It is well known that charged analytes in the presence of nonuniform electric fields concentrate at locations where the relevant driving forces balance, and a wide range of ionic stacking and focusing methods are commonly employed to leverage these physical mechanisms in order to improve signal levels in biosensing applications. In particular, nanofluidic channels with spatially varying conductivity distributions have been shown to provide increased preconcentration of charged analytes due to the existence of a finite electric double layer (EDL), in which electrostatic attraction and repulsion from charged surfaces produce nonuniform transverse ion distributions. In this work, we use numerical simulations to show that one can achieve greater levels of sample accumulation by using field-effect control via wall-embedded electrodes to tailor the surface potential heterogeneity in a nanochannel with overlapped EDLs. In addition to previously demonstrated stacking and focusing mechanisms, we find that the coupling between two-dimensional ion distributions and the axial electric field under overlapped EDL conditions can generate an ion concentration polarization interface in the middle of the channel. Under an applied electric field, this interface can be used to concentrate sample ions between two stationary regions of different surface potential and charge density. Our numerical model uses the Poisson-Nernst-Planck system of equations coupled with the Stokes equation to demonstrate the phenomenon, and we discuss in detail the driving forces behind the predicted sample enhancement. The numerical velocity and salt concentration profiles exhibit good agreement with analytical results from a simplified one-dimensional area-averaged model for several limiting cases, and we show predicted amplification ratios of up to 105.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 13 April 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.124203

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid DynamicsInterdisciplinary Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. Eden1,*, C. McCallum1, B. D. Storey2, S. Pennathur1, and C. D. Meinhart1,†

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA
  • 2Olin College of Engineering, Olin College, Needham, Massachusetts 02492, USA

  • *a_eden@engineering.ucsb.edu
  • meinhart@engineering.ucsb.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 2, Iss. 12 — December 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×