Crossover from equilibration to aging: Nonequilibrium theory versus simulations

P. Mendoza-Méndez, E. Lázaro-Lázaro, L. E. Sánchez-Díaz, P. E. Ramírez-González, G. Pérez-Ángel, and M. Medina-Noyola
Phys. Rev. E 96, 022608 – Published 14 August 2017

Abstract

Understanding glasses and the glass transition requires comprehending the nature of the crossover from the ergodic (or equilibrium) regime, in which the stationary properties of the system have no history dependence, to the mysterious glass transition region, where the measured properties are nonstationary and depend on the protocol of preparation. In this work we use nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations to test the main features of the crossover predicted by the molecular version of the recently developed multicomponent nonequilibrium self-consistent generalized Langevin equation theory. According to this theory, the glass transition involves the abrupt passage from the ordinary pattern of full equilibration to the aging scenario characteristic of glass-forming liquids. The same theory explains that this abrupt transition will always be observed as a blurred crossover due to the unavoidable finiteness of the time window of any experimental observation. We find that within their finite waiting-time window, the simulations confirm the general trends predicted by the theory.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 29 December 2015
  • Revised 17 February 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022608

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
  1. Physical Systems
Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

P. Mendoza-Méndez1,*, E. Lázaro-Lázaro1, L. E. Sánchez-Díaz2,†, P. E. Ramírez-González3, G. Pérez-Ángel4, and M. Medina-Noyola1,‡

  • 1Instituto de Física “Manuel Sandoval Vallarta,” Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Álvaro Obregón 64, 78000 San Luis Potosí, SLP, México
  • 2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 3CONACYT–Instituto de Física “Manuel Sandoval Vallarta,” Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Álvaro Obregón 64, 78000 San Luis Potosí, SLP, México
  • 4Departamento de Física Aplicada CINVESTAV-IPN, Unidad Mérida Apartado Postal 73 Cordemex, 97310 Mérida, Yuc., México

  • *Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Whitacre College of Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-3121, USA.
  • Present address: Shull Wollan Center–Joint Institute for Neutron Sciences, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA.
  • Present address: División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Física, Universidad de Guanajuato, Loma del Bosque 103, 37150 León, México.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 2 — August 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×