Smallest scale of wrinkles of a Huygens front in extremely strong turbulence

V. A. Sabelnikov, A. N. Lipatnikov, and A. I. Troshin
Phys. Rev. E 104, 045101 – Published 11 October 2021

Abstract

By analyzing the statistically stationary stage of propagation of a Huygens front in homogeneous, isotropic, constant-density turbulence, a length scale l0 is introduced to characterize the smallest wrinkles on the front surface in the case of a low constant speed u0 of the front when compared to the Kolmogorov velocity uK. The length scale is derived following a hypothesis of dynamical similarity that highlights a balance between (i) creation of a front area due to advection and (ii) destruction of the front area due to propagation. Consequently, the front speed is compared with the magnitude of the fluid velocity difference in two points separated by a distance smaller than the Kolmogorov length scale. Appropriateness of the smallest wrinkle scale is demonstrated by applying a fractal approach to evaluating the mean area of the instantaneous front surface. Since the scales of the smallest and larger wrinkles belong to different subranges (dissipation and inertial, respectively) of the Kolmogorov turbulence spectrum, the front is hypothesized to be a bifractal characterized by two different fractal dimensions in the two subranges. Both fractal dimensions are evaluated adapting the aforementioned hypothesis of dynamical similarity. Such a bifractal model yields a linear relation between the mean fluid consumption velocity, which is equal to the front speed u0 multiplied with a ratio of the mean area of the instantaneous front surface to the transverse projected area, and the rms turbulent velocity u even if a ratio of u0/u tends to zero.

  • Received 24 June 2021
  • Revised 8 September 2021
  • Accepted 20 September 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.045101

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

V. A. Sabelnikov1,2, A. N. Lipatnikov3, and A. I. Troshin2,4

  • 1ONERA – The French Aerospace Laboratory, BP 80100, FR-91123 Palaiseau, France
  • 2Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), 140180 Zhukovsky, Moscow Region, Russian Federation
  • 3Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 4Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 4 — October 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×