Casimir self-entropy of an electromagnetic thin sheet

Yang Li, Kimball A. Milton, Pushpa Kalauni, and Prachi Parashar
Phys. Rev. D 94, 085010 – Published 13 October 2016

Abstract

Casimir entropies due to quantum fluctuations in the interaction between electrical bodies can often be negative, caused either by dissipation or by geometry. Although generally such entropies vanish at zero temperature, consistent with the third law of thermodynamics (the Nernst heat theorem), there is a region in the space of temperature and separation between the bodies where negative entropy occurs, while positive interaction entropies arise for large distances or temperatures. Systematic studies on this phenomenon in the Casimir-Polder interaction between a polarizable nanoparticle or atom and a conducting plate in the dipole approximation have been given recently. Since the total entropy should be positive according to the second law of thermodynamics, we expect that the self-entropy of the bodies would be sufficiently positive as to overwhelm the negative interaction entropy. This expectation, however, has not been explicitly verified. Here we compute the self-entropy of an electromagnetic δ-function plate, which corresponds to a perfectly conducting sheet in the strong coupling limit. The transverse electric contribution to the self-entropy is negative, while the transverse magnetic contribution is larger and positive, so the total self-entropy is positive. However, this self-entropy vanishes in the strong-coupling limit. In that case, it is the self-entropy of the nanoparticle, which we recalculate in the perfect conducting limit, that is just sufficient to result in a non-negative total entropy.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 July 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085010

© 2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Yang Li1,*, Kimball A. Milton1,†, Pushpa Kalauni1,‡, and Prachi Parashar1,2,3,§

  • 1H. L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, Southern Illinois University–Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois 62091, USA
  • 3Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

  • *liyang@ou.edu
  • kmilton@ou.edu
  • pushpa@ou.edu
  • §prachi@nhn.ou.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 94, Iss. 8 — 15 October 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×