Scalar excitation with Leggett frequency in He3B and the 125 GeV Higgs particle in top quark condensation models as pseudo-Goldstone bosons

G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov
Phys. Rev. D 92, 055004 – Published 2 September 2015

Abstract

We consider the scenario in which the light Higgs scalar boson appears as the pseudo-Goldstone boson. We discuss examples in both condensed matter and relativistic field theory. In He3B the symmetry breaking gives rise to four Nambu-Goldstone (NG) modes and 14 Higgs modes. At lower energy one of the four NG modes becomes the Higgs boson with a small mass. This is the mode measured in experiments with the longitudinal NMR, and the Higgs mass corresponds to the Leggett frequency MH=ΩB. The formation of the Higgs mass is the result of the violation of the hidden spin-orbit symmetry at low energy. In this scenario the symmetry-breaking energy scale Δ (the gap in the fermionic spectrum) and the Higgs mass scale MH are highly separated: MHΔ. On the particle physics side we consider the model inspired by the models of Refs. Cheng et al. [J. High Energy Phys. 08 (014) 095] and Fukano et al. [Phys. Rev. D 90, 055009 (2014)]. At high energies the SU(3) symmetry is assumed which relates the left-handed top and bottom quarks to the additional fermion χL. This symmetry is softly broken at low energies. As a result the only CP-even Goldstone boson acquires a mass and may be considered as a candidate for the 125 GeV scalar boson. We consider a condensation pattern different from that typically used in top-seesaw models, where the condensate t¯LχR is off-diagonal. In our case the condensates are mostly diagonal. Unlike the work of Cheng et al. [J. High Energy Phys. 08 (014) 095] and Fukano et al. [Phys. Rev. D 90, 055009 (2014)], the explicit mass terms are absent and the soft breaking of SU(3) symmetry is given solely by the four-fermion terms. This reveals a complete analogy with He3, where there is no explicit mass term and the spin-orbit interaction has the form of the four-fermion interaction.

  • Received 2 December 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.055004

© 2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

G. E. Volovik1,2 and M. A. Zubkov3,4,5,6

  • 1Low Temperature Laboratory, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
  • 2Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics RAS, Kosygina 2, 119334 Moscow, Russia
  • 3Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow 117259, Russia
  • 4Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9, Institutskii per., Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, 141700, Russia
  • 5Far Eastern Federal University, School of Biomedicine, 690950 Vladivostok, Russia
  • 6CNRS, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Physique Théorique, Université François-Rabelais, Fédération Denis Poisson—CNRS, Parc de Grandmont, Université de Tours, 37200, France

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 5 — 1 September 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×