Kaon and pion parton distribution amplitudes to twist three

Chao Shi, Chen Chen, Lei Chang, Craig D. Roberts, Sebastian M. Schmidt, and Hong-Shi Zong
Phys. Rev. D 92, 014035 – Published 30 July 2015

Abstract

We compute all kaon and pion parton distribution amplitudes (PDAs) to twist three and find that only the pseudotensor PDA can reasonably be approximated by its conformal limit expression. At terrestrially accessible energy scales, the twist-two and pseudoscalar twist-three PDAs differ significantly from those functions commonly associated with their forms in QCD’s conformal limit. In all amplitudes studied, SU(3) flavor-symmetry breaking is typically a 13% effect. This scale is determined by nonperturbative dynamics; namely, the current-quark-mass dependence of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. The heavier quark is favored by this distortion; for example, support is shifted to the s-quark in the negative kaon. It appears, therefore, that at energy scales accessible with existing and foreseeable facilities, one may obtain reliable expectations for experimental outcomes by using these “strongly dressed” PDAs in formulas for hard exclusive processes. Following this procedure, any discrepancies between experiment and theory will be significantly smaller than those produced by using the conformal-limit PDAs. Moreover, the magnitude of any disagreement will either be a better estimate of higher-order, higher-twist effects or provide more realistic constraints on the Standard Model.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 April 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014035

© 2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Chao Shi1,2, Chen Chen3,4, Lei Chang5, Craig D. Roberts6,*, Sebastian M. Schmidt7, and Hong-Shi Zong2,*

  • 1Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, MOE, Institute of Acoustics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 2Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 3Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People’s Republic of China
  • 4Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People’s Republic of China
  • 5CSSM, School of Chemistry and Physics University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
  • 6Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 7Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich and JARA, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

  • *To whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 1 — 1 July 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×