Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of geographically separated detectors: Coherent versus coincident strategies

Himan Mukhopadhyay, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Sanjeev Dhurandhar, and Nobuyuki Kanda
Phys. Rev. D 80, 123019 – Published 30 December 2009

Abstract

We compare two strategies of multidetector detection of compact binary inspiral signals, namely, the coincidence and the coherent for the realistic case of geographically separated detectors. The naive coincident strategy treats the detectors as if they are isolated—compares individual detector statistics with their respective thresholds while the coherent strategy combines the detector network data coherently to obtain a single detection statistic which is then compared with a single threshold. We also consider an enhanced coincidence strategy which is intermediate in the sense that though the individual statistics are added in quadrature and the sum compared with a single threshold, the estimated parameters are also checked for consistency. For simplicity, we consider detector pairs having the same power spectral density of noise, as that of initial LIGO and also assume the noise to be stationary and Gaussian. Further, since we consider the detectors to be widely separated on Earth, we take the instrumental noises to be uncorrelated; the wide separation implicitly means that since the detector arms must lie parallel to the Earth’s surface, the detectors necessarily have different orientations. We compare the performances of the methods by plotting the receiver operating characteristics for the strategies. Several results are derived analytically in order to gain insight. Simulations are performed in order to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A single astrophysical source as well as a distribution of sources is considered. We assume a 1 yr data train and a mass range of 140M for the case of astrophysically distributed sources. We find that the coherent strategy is superior to the two coincident strategies that we consider. Remarkably, the detection probability of the coherent strategy is 50% better than the naive coincident strategy. One the other hand, the difference in performance between the coherent strategy and enhanced coincident strategy is not very large. Even in this situation, it is not difficult to perform the real data analysis with the coherent strategy. The bottom line is that the coherent strategy is a good detection strategy.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 28 October 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.123019

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Himan Mukhopadhyay1, Hideyuki Tagoshi2, Sanjeev Dhurandhar1, and Nobuyuki Kanda3

  • 1Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India
  • 2Department of Earth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
  • 3Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585, Japan

See Also

Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of detectors: Coherent versus coincident strategies

Himan Mukhopadhyay, Norichika Sago, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Sanjeev Dhurandhar, Hirotaka Takahashi, and Nobuyuki Kanda
Phys. Rev. D 74, 083005 (2006)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 80, Iss. 12 — 15 December 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×