3D scalar model as a 4D perfect conductor limit: Dimensional reduction and variational boundary conditions

Ariel Edery, Noah Graham, and Ilana MacDonald
Phys. Rev. D 79, 125018 – Published 19 June 2009

Abstract

Under dimensional reduction, a system in D spacetime dimensions will not necessarily yield its D1-dimensional analog version. Among other things, this result will depend on the boundary conditions and the dimension D of the system. We investigate this question for scalar and Abelian gauge fields under boundary conditions that obey the symmetries of the action. We apply our findings to the Casimir piston, an ideal system for detecting boundary effects. Our investigation is not limited to extra dimensions and we show that the original piston scenario proposed in 2004, a toy model involving a scalar field in 3D (2+1) dimensions, can be obtained via dimensional reduction from a more realistic 4D electromagnetic (EM) system. We show that for perfect conductor conditions, a D-dimensional EM field reduces to a D1 scalar field and not its lower-dimensional version. For Dirichlet boundary conditions, no theory is recovered under dimensional reduction and the Casimir pressure goes to zero in any dimension. This “zero Dirichlet” result is useful for understanding the EM case. We then identify two special systems where the lower-dimensional version is recovered in any dimension: systems with perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) and Neumann boundary conditions. We show that these two boundary conditions can be obtained from a variational procedure in which the action vanishes outside the bounded region. The fields are free to vary on the surface and have zero modes, which survive after dimensional reduction.

  • Figure
  • Received 29 March 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.125018

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Ariel Edery1,2,*, Noah Graham2,3,†, and Ilana MacDonald4,1,‡

  • 1Physics Department, Bishop’s University, 2600 College Street, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1M 0C8
  • 2Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Kohn Hall, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont 05753, USA
  • 4Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3H4

  • *aedery@ubishops.ca
  • ngraham@middlebury.edu
  • macdonald@astro.utoronto.ca

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 79, Iss. 12 — 15 June 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×